2021-3-2_PR_Comm Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

16. Concern was raised regarding wildlife and habitat destruction for local wildlife. Developer agrees that that is an important issue and that steps will be taken to mitigate all tree loss damage and habitat damage as possible. 17. A concern was raised regarding the common lake access for the future property owners. The developer confirmed that access to that property will be gated but that all owners will have access of some type to that area at all times. A request for a crosswalk on VictoriaStreetwas made for that locationand the developer responded that city and County guidelines would be taken into consideration for all matters related to that issue. 18.Acomment was made with respect to the gate for the common access to the Lake for property owners that a gate did notbuild “community”in the neighborhood. the developer understands that concern however it is a private access for the owners of these lots only and it isthere to protect the Association from potential unwanted access in the future. 19.Concerns were raised about driveways and access to Victoria St. The developer responded that each lot when the home is constructed, will contain its own private turn around so no one has to back onto Victoria St. That would essentially be a lateral wing on each driveway to allow for the ability of a vehicle to turn around. 20. A community member questioned the 40 mile an hour speed limit in area and ask that it be reduced to 30. Question was raised regarding the doc used by the lots East of Victoria and it was confirmed that all owners of any lot in the proposed plat would have access to that dark. 21. A question was raised with respect to dredging of material in the Lake just offshore from these lots and whether that would be allowed. Developer responded that that is not a development issue necessarily but would be a question for the DNR to approve at the appropriate time if that were requested by an owner. 22. A comment was made that the builder is constructing the subdivision and will get its money back for its expenses from the sale of each lot and that fact was confirmed for the community. 23. A comment was made that some of the neighbors in the vicinity did not get the mailing regarding the zoom meeting. 24. a community member expressed that it is difficult to Bolt in the area along the property on the southern end of Lake Owosso due to vegetation growth. There was concern that a buyer may not be able two boat and access the Lake but only view the Lake. An additional point was raised related to the value of a dock on the Lake and the developer indicated that there was no confirmation for buyers that the Lake was swimmable or boatable from those lots at this stage. Discussion continued that if buyers wanted to construct docs that would require DNR approval and that developer was giving no guarantee of that approval.