Laserfiche WebLink
o Engagement method <br />Direct mailing <br /> Electronic notice <br /> Listening session <br /> City newsletter <br /> Direct Engagement <br />Target: 25 people <br /> <br />Roseville residents beyond the park neighborhood <br /> Electronic notice <br /> Listening session <br /> City newsletter <br /> Web page <br /> HRIEC <br /> Commission members outreach (Commission members) <br /> Target: 50 people <br /> <br />Sufficient Engagement Will Have Been Accomplished When: <br /> A significant number of each of the stakeholder groups above have provided input (see <br />“targets” above). <br /> Impacted groups such as neighbors, Roseville’s native community and the greater <br />Roseville community is aware of the issue and conversation. <br />IV. Analysis <br />Parks and Recreation Commission Members shall review and analyze the data collected and <br />make a recommendation to the City Council to either keep the name the same, change the name <br />or engage in further conversation on the issue. If the commission recommends a name change, <br />the City Council may ask the Parks and Recreation Commission to continue this process to <br />recommend a new name to the city council. <br />It is important to note that the City’s Racial Equity Narrative will be utilized in the analysis of <br />the data and the provision of a recommendation. This process isnot intended to be a simple <br />“straw poll” on the issue. <br />V. Implementation <br />The proposed process consists of(completed items italicized): <br /> <br />