2021-4-2_PR_Comm_Min - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Chair Hoag suggested to consider stronger language around “useable parkland”. The Commission reviewed the cash Park Dedication amount. Including, the most recent Park Dedication comparison of surrounding communities. Park Dedication– cash amount o Reviewed annually o Part of the city fee schedule o Residential is $4,250 o Non-residential is 10% FMV Park Dedication – land amount o Residential – land amount is currently at 10% of the land o Non-residential – land amount is currently at 5% of the land Non-residential has lagged behind and is not consistent with the cash amount of 10%. Staff provided a suggestion that this discrepancy potentially be reconciled with the updated ordinance language Utility Dedications Not Qualified o Set periodically in ordinance o Utility Dedications Not Qualified Land dedication for required street right-of-way or utilities; including drainage, does not qualify as Park Dedication (Ord. 1530, 7/10/2017) This issue has come up recently with some Park Dedication proposals from the developer Pathways and sidewalks are typically required as a part of a Public Improvement Contract Staff is suggesting language to including “required pathways or sidewalks” in the proposed ordinance update Currently in practice The Commission had a clarification discussion on when pathways or sidewalks would be included in a Park Dedication recommendation and how/who determines if a pathway or sidewalk is required. Staff provided the draft potential Park Dedication Ordinance. The updated language has relatively simple language adjustments that would allow the city to capture additional Park Dedication contributions. Staff noted that Roseville invests heavily in the parks and Park Dedication is one way to help offset additional usage that comes from new developments. Staff reiterated that the legal aspects are yet to be sorted out. However, the redline changes are based on information gathering as suggested by the City Council. 4