Laserfiche WebLink
Member Joyce asked if the pathway could be used or is it needed for a fire lane. <br />Mr. Culver explained it is not needed for a fire lane. From the City's perspective, <br />there is appropriate and ample access to these properties via South McCarron. <br />Chair Wozniak indicated he would like to start off by considering the pathways that <br />have received the fewest comments with the Commission considering these <br />pathways based on the comments submitted and presented. He would like to set <br />aside Tamarack as a separate consideration. <br />Chair Wozniak opened the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. for Marion, Eustis, Lydia, <br />Snelling, and Fairview Pathway Masterplan Segments. <br />No one wished to address the Commission regarding these pathway segment <br />proposals. <br />Chair Wozniak closed the public hearing at 7:41 p.m. on the five proposed <br />segments. <br />Vice Chair Ficek indicated these pathways are not imminent and there is no <br />construction planned for them, but they are lines on paper which put it out there for <br />people to see that this is where the City would like the pathways. He thought there <br />was a lot of detail to be explored. That in combination with the Commission not <br />hearing any opposition to them, he would like to make a motion. <br />Motion <br />Member Ficek moved, Member Cicha seconded, to recommend the City <br />Council amend the Pathway Masterplan to include the Marion, Eustis, Lydia, <br />Snelling, and Fairview segments with comments on the five segments <br />submitted by the public. <br />Chair Wozniak indicated there was at least one comment submitted online in <br />opposition to the Eustis segment as well as some opposition for the Lydia segment. <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Chair Wozniak opened the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. for the Tamarack Pathway <br />Masterplan Segment. <br />Mr. Matt Anderson, Anderson Law Group, indicated he was representing several <br />residents along South McCarrons Boulevard. He explained he was going to keep <br />his comments to the legal aspect of this item and would allow the residents to also <br />speak on this as well. He thought the Commission should know the implications. <br />This is a street. It has been referred to as a right-of-way corridor, but this is a street <br />Page 4 of 10 <br />