My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021_1123_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2021
>
2021_1123_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2021 3:37:27 PM
Creation date
11/24/2021 3:36:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/23/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
171 now, Eureka purchased this batch of carts in 2013, that was when the City moved <br />172 from the bins to the carts. There are some new carts out there that needed replacing <br />173 but the bulk of them are going on ten years old so the question would be, how long <br />174 will Eureka keep the carts out there before replacing them and what could the City <br />175 do with those old carts. He indicated if the City purchased their own carts he <br />176 thought Eureka might attempt to repurpose those as much as they could with some <br />177 of their existing customers because they are not branded for Roseville. That is a <br />178 very good question from a sustainability perspective. <br />179 <br />180 Motion <br />181 Member Ficek moved, Member Spencer seconded, to recommend the <br />182 increases in the rates as proposed to the City Council with a larger fee for the <br />183 recycling fee to start building up a surplus for future use and to add the study <br />184 for potential cost impacts using City owned carts versus vendor owned carts. <br />185 <br />186 Ayes:5 <br />187 Nays:0 <br />188 Motion carried. <br />189 <br />190 6. Introduction to Crosswalk Treatments <br />191 Mr. Culver explained the Commission is asked to provide feedback about the use <br />192 of crosswalks on City roadways. He reviewed the information with the <br />193 Commission. <br />194 <br />195 Member Spencer indicated with the construction at Rosedale and the apartments <br />196 coming in, have they looked at upgrading more of the crosswalks in that area <br />197 <br />198 Mr. Freihammer explained all of those are on county roads. The County is <br />199 upgrading all of the crossings and putting updated ADA ramps as well as upgraded <br />200 countdown timers as well as the APS system. There are no current plans to add <br />201 more crossings. <br />202 <br />203 Chair Wozniak thought people are using trails more than previously and, given that <br />204 and they have not seen or heard of crashes with pedestrians, he thought the <br />205 markings were doing what they are supposed to do and that is drawing attention to <br />206 drivers to let pedestrians cross where they legally can. <br />207 <br />208 7. Items for Next Meeting — November 2021 <br />209 Discussion ensued regarding the November PWETC agenda: <br />210 • Public Works 2021 Work Plan <br />211 • Continuation of Crosswalk Treatments Discussion <br />212 • Discuss Super Meeting <br />213 • Public Works Tour <br />214 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.