My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_0511_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020
>
2020_0511_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2022 8:56:41 AM
Creation date
1/7/2022 8:56:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
5/11/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT D ATTACHMENT AATTACHMENT B <br />33 b. The City may accept a cash-in-lieu tree replacement payment in accordance with the <br />34 required fee listed in the City Fee Schedule. In no instance shall a cash- in-lieu <br />35 payment exceed 10% of the Fair Market Value of the development site; or <br />36 c. The City may approve a combination of tree replacement in accordance with “a” <br />37 above and a payment consistent with “b” above to fulfill this requirement. (Ord. 1503, <br />38 7-11-2016) <br />39 To summarize the above standards, staff offers the list of requirements to assist in understanding <br />40 implementation of thissection: <br />41 A completed tree survey of property is submitted, which includes a calculation of the caliper <br />42 inches of replacement trees required. <br />43 Based on the submitted tree survey, the applicant can plant said caliper inches of trees on the <br />44 subject property; or <br />45 o Plant some of the caliper inches of trees on the subject property and plant <br />46 remainder of caliper inches on properties within 1,000 feet of the subject site; or <br />47 o Plant same as above and pay the City a tree replacement fee of $500 for each 3 <br />48 inches of trees that cannot be planted. <br />49 The Whitcomb lot has a total of 22 trees. 6 trees are in poor condition and exempt from being <br />50 counted; 2 trees are ash and exempt from being counted; and 6 are being removed. After all <br />51 calculations and multipliers have been added, the Whitcomb lot is required to replace 77 caliper <br />52 inches of trees or 26 trees 3 caliper inches in size (see Attachment C – tree preservation plan). <br />53 Based on the size of the lot (.31 acres), the location of the home and driveway, and the locations <br />54 of 10 preserved trees, the property can comfortably accommodate 3 canopy trees without <br />55 crowding other trees (see Attachment D – forester comments). However, it may be possible to <br />56 plant 4 canopy trees and 2 ornamental trees on the property without crowding the existing trees <br />57 or negatively impacting the proposed improvements to the property. This would allow a total of <br />58 15 caliper inches to be implemented on site from the 77 required, resulting in a revised total of <br />59 62 inches or 21 trees. The remaining required trees would either need to be planted within 1,000 <br />60 feet of the property or be required to pay a $500 per 3 caliper inches of replacement trees or a <br />61 $10,500 replacement. <br />62 The Whitcomb’s narrative states their belief the requirements of §1011.04.J.8 are unreasonable <br />63 and burdensome for a residential home builder to absorb into the overall cost to build a new <br />64 home. Specifically, the requirements are too expensive. Additionally, the applicant and/or their <br />65 builder are not interested in attempting a process to seek out property owners within 1,000 feet of <br />66 the subject property to plant trees as it is highly unlikely they could fulfill their required 21 trees, <br />67 but also because that process would expend an unreasonable amount of time and be overly <br />68 burdensome to take on in combination with building a new home (see Attachment D – narrative). <br />69 V ARIANCE A NALYSIS <br />70 Section 1009.04C of the City Code establishes a mandate the Variance Board make five specific <br />71 findings about a variance request as a prerequisite for approving the variance. Planning Division <br />72 staff has reviewed the application and offers the following draft findings: <br />73 a. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Roseville 2030 Comprehensive <br />74 Plan encourages the City to promote preservation, replacement, and addition of trees in the <br />75 community, as well as to promote well planned and coordinated development. Planning <br />PF19-013_RVBA_907Burke_071019 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.