My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_0518_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020
>
2020_0518_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2022 9:35:26 AM
Creation date
1/7/2022 9:34:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
5/18/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
569
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
29May 13,2020:The City Planner submitted the Roseville staff suggested <br />30 responses to the public comments to the EAW to Launch <br />31 Properties, Dominium, and Kimley-Horn for their reviewand <br />32 comment. <br />33 May 14, 2020: The City Planner emailed the City’s responsesfrom theTwin <br />34 Lakes Station EAW to all persons who commented during the <br />35 30-day comment period, fulfilling requirements under the <br />36 Minnesota Administrative Rules governing EAW’s. <br />E <br />37 NVIRONMENTAL A SSESSMENT W ORKSHEET P ROCESS <br />38 In accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4410.1700, the City is required to determine whether <br />39 or not the project has the potential for significant environmental effects such that an EIS should <br />40 be completed. This decision and subsequent action by the City Council requires the review of <br />41 the Twin Lakes StationEAW and all comments submitted by state, county and/or local agencies <br />42 and citizens. In this instance, only state agencies returned comments on the EAW. The Record <br />43 of Decision, including Finding of Fact and responses to comments, is provided as Attachment B <br />44 and would be made part of the Resolution requested for adoption. <br />45 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION: <br />46 Based on the information contained in the EAWRecord of Decision, City staff has determined <br />47 there is no potential for significant environmental effects from the proposed Twin Lakes Station <br />48 redevelopment project. All issues identified by the EAW can be addressed as part of the <br />49 development process and nothing out of the ordinary was discovered that would require further <br />50 review via an Environmental Impact Statement. Staff is therefore recommending adoption of a <br />51Resolution, memorializing the Twin Lakes StationEAW Record of Decision, making a negative <br />52declaration as to theneed for anEnvironmental Impact Statement. <br />53 UGGESTED C ITY C OUNCIL A CTION <br />S <br />54 ADOPT a RESOLUTION memorializing the Twin Lakes Station EAW Record of Decision, <br />55 finding that an Environmental Impact Statement will not be necessary. <br />56 If the Roseville City Council believes further environmental review (i.e. an EIS) should be <br />57 completed, then the Council should provide direction to the Community Development <br />58 <br />Department on said reasons and direct staff to prepare findings consistent with those reasons. <br />Prepared by: City Planner Thomas Paschke <br />Attachments: A. Resolution <br /> B. Record of Decision & Findings of Fact <br /> C. Twin Lakes Station EAW <br /> <br />PROJ0046_TwinLakesStationEAW <br />Page 2of 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.