My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_0921_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020
>
2020_0921_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2022 1:59:47 PM
Creation date
1/10/2022 1:59:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
9/21/2020
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment D-9212020 <br />546 Community Development Customer Service Rep./Permit Technician* $2,200 <br />547 Public Works Environmental Specialist to Environmental Manager* $2,700 <br />548 <br />549 Total $11,650 <br />550 Total Levy Impact (Net) $ 6,750 <br />551 <br />552 *Costs for these position adjustments will be paid for with non-levy funds. <br />553 <br />554 New Position Î Levy Supported <br />555 I am recommending that an Administrative Department intern be officially incorporated into the <br />556 2021. Over the years, the Administration Department has been able to host an intern for short <br />557 periods of time at low cost for special projects by assembling small amounts of unused dollars <br />558 from the Administration Department budget. Assistant City Manager Rebecca Olson has been <br />559 successful in recruiting persons of color who are studying government and/or public <br />560 administration to work for the city on a limited basis. This budget request would officially <br />561 incorporate the Administration Department Intern position into the city budget at a cost of <br />562 $15,000. The intern would continue to be a student studying or recently graduated from the field <br />563 of Public Administration and/or Government with special focus on persons of color. <br />564 <br />565 City Manager Recommendation Î Add One Administration Department Intern <br />566 Position <br />567 2021 Levy Impact: $15,000 <br />568 <br />569 New Positions Î Non-Levy Supported <br />570 In addition to the new positions mentioned previously, the 2021 budget includes funding for two <br />571 new positions: a building inspector in Community Development and one License Center <br />572 Customer Service Representative. Both new positions will be funded from fees collected by the <br />573 City and not impact the tax levy. <br />574 <br />575 Building Inspector <br />576 The Community Development Department is proposing the addition of a building inspector. <br />577 This additional inspector is primarily driven by the expansion plans at Rosedale Center and <br />578 their expected timeline for construction commencement in 2021. The following is noted <br />579 related to this request: <br />580 Rosedale CenterÓs expansion plans include construction of 565 multi-family apartment <br />581 units, two hotels with up to 350 rooms, 90,000 SF of office space, and up to an <br />582 additional 200,000 SF of retail space. While all of these elements will not be added at <br />583 once, staff could easily envision this project needing a building inspector every day for <br />584 multiple hours, putting a greater burden on the existing staff to complete inspections <br />585 elsewhere throughout the City. <br />st <br />586 Staff has no intention of filling this position on January 1, rather, we will wait to hire <br />587 the position until we are relatively certain the Rosedale project will start in 2021. <br />588 In anticipation of hiring an additional Building Inspector, temporary wages for a <br />589 seasonal employee have been removed from the 2021 budget with the understanding <br />590 that the additional FTE will be sufficient to cover the added seasonal work. <br />591 If the Rosedale plans do not proceed in 2021, instead of hiring the FTE, we would hire <br />592 a seasonal. This scenario would result in a cost-savings. <br />593 <br />Page 18 of 20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.