Laserfiche WebLink
7b RCA UPDATED <br />Page 2 of 13 <br />The applicant proposes to remove the existing house at 210 S McCarrons Boulevard and subdivide the 5 <br />three residential parcels generally addressed as 196 – 210 S McCarrons Boulevard, resulting in the 20-6 <br />lot The Enclave at McCarrons Lake plat for development of single-family detached townhomes and a 7 <br />shared lake-access parcel. The proposed townhome lots are designed to conform to the requirements of 8 <br />the MDR zoning district, which already regulates the five-acre 210 S McCarrons Boulevard parcels, but 9 <br />a change of the comprehensive plan land use map from Low-Density Residential (LR) to Medium-10 <br />Density Residential (MR) and rezoning from the Low-Density Residential 1 (LDR-1) district to the 11 <br />Medium-Density Residential (MDR) district are necessary for the 196 S McCarrons Boulevard parcel. 12 <br />The plat relies on a subdivision variance to the maximum length of a cul-de-sac street. The applicant 13 <br />also seeks approval of two, more discretionary elements of the development: provision of a shared lake 14 <br />access among the future homeowners’ association members as a conditional use, and a variance to set 15 <br />most of its dwellings at a side property line to preserve a larger, more usable space in the opposite side 16 <br />yard. Illustrations and other information about the proposed development are included with this RCA in 17 <br />Attachment C. 18 <br />When exercising the City’s legislative authority on a comprehensive plan change or rezoning request, 19 <br />the role of the City is to review a proposal for its merits in addition to evaluating the potential impacts to 20 <br />the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community. If a comprehensive plan change or 21 <br />rezoning request is found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is otherwise a desirable 22 <br />proposal, the City may still deny the request if the proposal is found to compromise the public health, 23 <br />safety, and general welfare. 24 <br />When exercising the “quasi-judicial” authority on subdivision, subdivision variance, zoning variance, 25 <br />and conditional use requests, the role of the City is to determine the facts associated with a particular 26 <br />proposal and apply those facts to the legal standards contained in the ordinance and relevant state law. In 27 <br />general, if the facts indicate the application meets the relevant legal standards and will not harm the 28 <br />public health, safety, and general welfare, then the applicant is likely entitled to the approval. The City 29 <br />is, however, able to add conditions to all such approvals to ensure that potential impacts to parks, 30 <br />schools, roads, storm sewers, other public infrastructure, and the surrounding community are adequately 31 <br />addressed. Subdivisions may also be modified to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, 32 <br />and to provide for the orderly, economic, and safe development of land, and to promote housing 33 <br />affordability for all levels. 34 <br />Easement Vacation 35 <br />The proposed drainage and utility easements as shown on the proposed plat meet the requirements of the 36 <br />City, and staff supports the proposed vacations provided these new easements will be dedicated in the 37 <br />plat. The City will require additional drainage and utility easement over the wetland, and the City 38 <br />Engineer has communicated this requirement to the developer. 39 <br />Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Change 40 <br />In order to facilitate the proposed development the applicant is requesting a change in how 196 S 41 <br />McCarrons Boulevard, at the eastern edge of the site, is guided in the Future Land Use Plan. 42 <br />Specifically, the applicant is seeking to change the land use guidance from the LR district to the MR 43 <br />district to match the bulk of the property in the development site. This process begins with a pre-44 <br />application community engagement effort. The applicant did not hold a conventional in-person meeting, 45 <br />but made themselves available for people to engage with by email and phone over several days, and held 46 <br />a virtual open house meeting during that time. A summary of this engagement is a required component 47 <br />of this application, and it was submitted to staff on January 8; staff emailed this summary to each 48 <br />community member who engaged in the process and provided an email address, and the summary is 49