My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021_0222_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
2021_0222_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 2:14:46 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 2:06:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
778
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7b RCA UPDATED <br />Page 3 of 13 <br />included with this RCA as part of Attachment D. Staff has also received additional emails from nearby 50 <br />homeowners after the open house process; these emails are also included in Attachment D. 51 <br />Planning Division staff has reviewed the proposal to develop the subject property with 20 single-family, 52 <br />detached townhomes to determine if the proposed land use map change from LR to MR at 196 S 53 <br />McCarrons Boulevard is supported by the Goals and Policies of Roseville’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 54 <br />Chapter 4: Land Use 55 <br />This chapter includes several goals and strategies that are essentially instructions to revise the City’s 56 <br />zoning and other regulations to achieve particular ends. As such, a strategy might simultaneously 57 <br />promote increasing housing density and preserving neighborhood character, which can seem 58 <br />contradictory in light of a proposal like the one being reviewed. Nevertheless, applicable Land Use 59 <br />strategies are as follows. 60 <br />• Create flexible development standards for new residential developments that allow innovative 61 <br />development patterns and more efficient densities that protect and enhance the character, 62 <br />stability, and vitality of residential neighborhoods. 63 <br />• Develop zoning regulations and policies to provide for a variety of housing types and densities to 64 <br />support a wide range of housing alternatives for current and future residents. This includes 65 <br />housing types that are sensitive to the cultural diversity of the city. 66 <br />Chapter 5: Housing 67 <br />The following housing-related goals and policies are relevant to the proposed development. 68 <br />• Explore opportunities to encourage smaller housing units, “non‐traditional” housing 69 <br />development (which could include culturally‐appropriate housing to reflect the population 70 <br />demographics of the City), and opportunities to address the lack of housing in the “missing 71 <br />middle” styles. 72 <br />The proposal doesn’t address the non-traditional, missing-middle, or culturally-appropriate 73 <br />aspects of this goal, but the smaller lots will limit the size of homes that can be built compared to 74 <br />new homes on standard single-family lots. 75 <br />• Meet increased demand for senior housing and opportunities for residents to age in place. 76 <br />The proposed development is not necessarily restricted to seniors, but the anticipated residential 77 <br />amenities tend to be particularly attractive to seniors. 78 <br />In 2018, Roseville’s Economic Development Authority hired Maxfield Research, Inc. to update the 79 <br />City’s Comprehensive Housing Needs Analysis to inform the housing policies in the 2040 80 <br />Comprehensive Plan as well as the objectives in the City Council’s Policy Priority Plan. This housing 81 <br />needs analysis includes following conclusions, which are relevant to the proposed project. 82 <br />• There is an identified need for 110 new, for-sale single family units between 2018-2030 (page 83 <br />131). 84 <br />• Fifty-five percent of the 110-unit need will be for “twin homes, detached villas, townhomes or 85 <br />condominiums” (page 113). 86 <br />• There is “strong” demand for smaller lot, smaller home with walk-outs and slab on grade for the 87 <br />empty-nester market. This also discusses that price is often the deterrent to realizing these units 88 <br />(page 143-144). 89 <br />The observed price deterrent reflects the fact that high development costs tend to prevent projects 90 <br />from being brought to market if the prices for the resulting homes are higher than the market will 91 <br />bear. By contrast, a project like the current proposal that survives to the completion of the 92
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.