Laserfiche WebLink
5 The applicant proposes to remove the existing house at 210 S McCarrons Boulevard and subdivide the <br />6 three residential parcels generally addressed as 196 – 210 S McCarrons Boulevard, resulting in the 20- <br />7 lot The Enclave at McCarrons Lake plat for development of single-family detached townhomes and a <br />8 shared lake-access parcel. The proposed townhome lots are designed to conform to the requirements of <br />9 the MDR zoning district, which already regulates the five-acre 210 S McCarrons Boulevard parcels, but <br />10 a change of the comprehensive plan land use map from Low-Density Residential (LR) to Medium- <br />11 Density Residential (MR) and rezoning from the Low-Density Residential 1 (LDR-1) district to the <br />12 Medium-Density Residential (MDR) district are necessary for the 196 S McCarrons Boulevard parcel. <br />13 The plat relies on a subdivision variance to the maximum length of a cul-de-sac street. The applicant <br />14 also seeks approval of two, more discretionary elements of the development: provision of a shared lake <br />15 access among the future homeowners’ association members as a conditional use, and a variance to set <br />16 most of its dwellings at a side property line to preserve a larger,more usable space in the opposite side <br />17 yard. Illustrations and other information about the proposed development are included with this RCA in <br />18 Attachment C. <br />19 When exercising the City’s legislative authority on a comprehensive plan change or rezoning request, <br />20 the role of the City is to review a proposal for its merits in addition to evaluating the potential impacts to <br />21 the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community. If a comprehensive plan change or <br />22 rezoning request is found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is otherwise a desirable <br />23 proposal, the City may still deny the request if the proposal is found to compromise the public health, <br />24 safety, and general welfare. <br />25 When exercising the “quasi-judicial” authority on subdivision, subdivision variance, zoning variance, <br />26 and conditional use requests, the role of the City is to determine the facts associated with a particular <br />27 proposal and apply those facts to the legal standards contained in the ordinance and relevant state law. In <br />28 general, if the facts indicate the application meets the relevant legal standards and will not harm the <br />29 public health, safety, and general welfare, then the applicant is likely entitled to the approval. The City <br />30 is, however, able to add conditions to all such approvals to ensure that potential impacts to parks, <br />31 schools, roads, storm sewers, other public infrastructure, and the surrounding community are adequately <br />32 addressed. Subdivisions may also be modified to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, <br />33 and to provide for the orderly, economic, and safe development of land, and to promote housing <br />34 affordability for all levels. <br />35 Easement Vacation <br />36 The proposed drainage and utility easements as shown on the proposed plat meet the requirements of the <br />37 City, and staff supports the proposed vacations provided these new easements will be dedicated in the <br />38 plat. The City will require additional drainage and utility easement over the wetland, and the City <br />39 Engineer has communicated this requirement to the developer. <br />40 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Change <br />41 In order to facilitate the proposed development the applicant is requesting a change in how 196 S <br />42 McCarrons Boulevard, at the eastern edge of the site, is guided in the Future Land Use Plan. <br />43 Specifically, the applicant is seeking to change the land use guidance from the LR district to the MR <br />44 district to match the bulk of the property in the development site. This process begins with a pre- <br />45 application community engagement effort. The applicant did not hold a conventional in-person meeting, <br />46 but made themselves available for people to engage with by email and phone over several days, and held <br />47 a virtual open house meeting during that time. A summary of this engagement is a required component <br />48 of this application, and it was submitted to staff on January 8; staff emailed this summary to each <br />49 community member who engaged in the process and provided an email address, and the summaryis <br />7b RCA UPDATED <br />Page 2 of 13 <br /> <br />