My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021_0222_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020
>
2021_0222_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 2:14:07 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 2:12:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/22/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
778
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
352 Each of these additional requirements is fairly clear, except for the standard about specific lot size. <br />353 While the provision does refer to lot width, the width of this shared access parcel is either much wider <br />354 than 170 feet or much narrower, depending on where the measurement is made. Notwithstanding the <br />355 uncertainty of exactly howto apply this requirement, the Planning Commission determinedthis standard <br />356 is not a limiting factor in this case. If the “specific size” of this parcel is determined by measuring its <br />357 width along S McCarrons Boulevard or along the shoreline, then its greater-than 400-foot width clearly <br />358 exceeds the minimum standard. If the specific size is measured in the main body of the parcel, by <br />359 contrast, then its width would be as little as 30 feet. In either case, the boundaries of this parcel of <br />360 lakeshore land are not changing by virtue of becoming Outlot B of The Enclave at McCarrons Lake plat; <br />361 to the extent its specific size may be found to be substandard, this deficiency is clearly a legal, <br />362 nonconforming condition. Finally, as these are standards established in the zoning code, they do not <br />363 need to be specified as conditions of approval of the controlled access as a conditional use. <br />364 Public Comment <br />365 Additional public comments sent to the City after the conclusion of the pre-application engagement <br />366 effort are, as noted above, included with this RCA as part of Attachment D. The duly noticed public <br />367 hearing for themany land use approvals requested to facilitate the proposed developmentwas held by <br />368 the Planning Commission on February 3, 2021. Members of the public who participated in the public <br />369 hearing mostly spoke in opposition to the proposal, citing similar concerns to those raised during and <br />370 after the pre-application engagement. Draft minutes of the public hearing are included as Attachment F. <br />371 At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend <br />372 approval of all parts of the proposal.The Commission’s recommendations contain several conditions <br />373 approval, including onerequiring the developer to increase the number of trees planted between Lot 1 <br />374 and Galtier Street as a compromise between the proposed plantings in that location and the request from <br />375 a member of the public to dedicate Lot 1 as park land to preserve more trees in that location. <br />376 P OLICY O BJECTIVE <br />377 <br />378 and retains a diverse mix of people, family types, economic statuses,ages,and so on. <br />379 Employ flexible zoning for property redevelopment to meet broader housing goals such as <br />380 density, open space, and lot size. <br />381 Explore opportunities to encourage smaller housing un <br />382 development (which could include propriate housing to reflect the population <br />383 demographics ofthe City), and opportunities to address the lack of housing in the “missing <br />384 middle”. <br />385 B UDGET I MPLICATIONS <br />386 Refer to DRC comments in Attachment E. <br />387 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION <br />388 Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission: <br />389 A. Adopt a resolution approving the requested Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Change from <br />390 Low-Density Residential to Medium-Density Residential at 196 S McCarrons Boulevard, based <br />391 on the content of this RCA, public input, and City Council deliberation regarding the goals and <br />392 strategies of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the 2018 Comprhensive Housing Needs Analysis, <br />393 the City Council’s Policy Priority Plan related to housing, and the Rice-Larpenteur Vision Plan, <br />7b RCA UPDATED <br />Page 10 of 13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.