My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021_0308_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
2021_0308_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 2:59:22 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 2:59:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/8/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January 4, 2021 <br />Page 16 <br />669 Councilmember Willmus indicated where he would start, is to reflect and look in- <br />670 ward. He wondered if there are things glaringly missing here or are there things <br />671 that the City has had great success with that, maybe fall off or looked at a little <br />672 differently. He thought as a core, these priorities are still very valid and are a work <br />673 in progress. He would look for a little feedback that way. <br />674 <br />675 Councilmember Etten explained there was substantial discussion the last time about <br />676 how to engage the community and how much to engage the public. The Council <br />677 always has public comment as a part of the meeting and maybe this could be in- <br />678 cluded in the City newsletter as they start zeroing in. <br />679 <br />680 Councilmember Groff thought it would help to have input at some point from the <br />681 public. From his experience, he thinks Roseville has changed since the Council did <br />682 the visioning in 2006. There are a lot of new residents that have moved to the city <br />683 and he thought that at some point, it might be beneficial to get community input. <br />684 What he is hearing is the environment and sustainability would be much higher on <br />685 the list then economic development. He would like more community input, but he <br />686 does not know what that would look like. <br />687 <br />688 Councilmember Strahan stated when she looked at this list, the way it is written <br />689 does not seem very much about the people. She commented that she just finished a <br />690 cycle of campaigning, at that level it is always about the people. So, the environ- <br />691 mental sustainability is somewhat removed from the people of Roseville and how <br />692 they can impact that. There seems to be a great will of people of interest have sig- <br />693 nificant environment impact and a very large priority. She wondered how it would <br />694 involve people and how could the community be drawn in. Those did not seem to <br />695 involve the people of the City of Roseville in the policy. Even the housing can be <br />696 somewhat removed as well. She wanted to make sure that the City does not remove <br />697 the people from the policies. <br />698 <br />699 Mayor Roe thought that is one of the things that needs to be made clear about the <br />700 document. This is primarily a document that says how the City Council and the <br />701 staff of the City are going to be spending their time over the next period and where <br />702 they are not spending their time. The notion being is that, for instance, there was a <br />703 pretty good discussion last time around about whether there is some kind of priority <br />704 activity related to public safety and everyone on the Council and staff that partici- <br />705 pated came to the conclusion that those things are ongoing and do not rise to the <br />706 level of something the City wants to put in this document. These are the things the <br />707 Council wants to be focusing on and he thought this is a document to guide the <br />708 work that the staff and Council do over a period of time and is informed by the most <br />709 recent Comprehensive Plan update, land use, and housing and also environmental <br />710 sustainability. There are other policy documents to guide the Council as well. <br />711 <br />712 Mayor Roe asked where the Council wants to go from here and should there be a <br />713 more comprehensive discussion. He suggested the Council do a deeper dive into <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.