My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021_0308_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
2021_0308_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 2:59:22 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 2:59:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/8/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January 4, 2021 <br />Page 17 <br />714 more specifics about the accomplishments to date, where the City Council stands <br />715 on these items, and then potentially have some conversations about additions or <br />716 subtractions and going from there. Then, the next discussion may be the next level <br />717 of conversation about those changes. <br />718 <br />719 The Council agreed. <br />720 <br />th <br />721 Mr. Trudgeon indicated he planned on bringing this back on January 25 for further <br />722 discussion. <br />723 <br />724 Public Comment <br />725 <br />726 Mayor Roe offered an opportunity for public comment. <br />727 <br />728 Miss Priscilla Morton <br />729 Ms. Morton explained she had specific comments about the environmental sus- <br />730 tainability portions of this plan, which she will defer because it will be discussed <br />731 at a later date. She did believe it was a very strong interest in the community and <br />732 it was not necessarily pointed out in the survey that was taken. Environmental <br />733 sustainability overlaps with things like development and housing and as the City <br />734 talks about these individual priorities, she hoped some of these discussions can be <br />735 merged so that the importance of how they overlap and effect each other are seen <br />736 from the point of view of the people who are actually living and working in the <br />737 development that is produced. <br />738 <br />739 f. Discuss RosevilleÓs 2021 Legislative Priorities <br />740 City Manager Patrick Trudgeon briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the Re- <br />741 quest for Council Action and related attachments dated January 4, 2021. <br />742 <br />743 Mayor Roe noted on the local option sales tax the calendar for 2021, consideration <br />744 is that the City has to get their list of projects, dollar amounts, tax value, and all of <br />745 that to the legislature by the end of this month in order for the legislature to take it <br />746 up in the 2021 session. He thought the recognition was that is not feasible. Where <br />747 this was left at the last Council discussion, was for staff to come back with some <br />748 numbers associated with those things, potential projects, costs, and what that might <br />749 look like, but things intervened and nothing has been followed through on that con- <br />750 versation. <br />751 <br />752 Councilmember Willmus stated that was something he wanted to call attention to <br />753 and with respect to the larger retail centers in the city and the impact that is being <br />754 seen on local infrastructure, this is something the Council needs to stay on top of <br />755 and be proactive with. He indicated they have frankly let this slide for many years <br />756 and now the City is at a point of time where the Council needs to be in front of it a <br />757 little bit so that the City is prepared for 2022. He noted there is significant potential <br />758 to help the City with infrastructure costs, it is something the Council wavers on <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.