My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 01312022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 01312022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2022 2:06:22 PM
Creation date
1/27/2022 2:05:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/31/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR <br />RCA Attachment E <br />MARCH 2, 2021 6:30 p.m. <br />The Development Team joined the call with the Commission. Eric Luth spoke for the developer <br />stating that they did not envision the location having any park use as it is a tight area for the houses <br />and they would prefer to pay cash in lieu of land. Duane noted that a bituminous trail will be added <br />outside of the requirements for the development. As the Development Team has been working with <br />Community Development it was relayed to them that the sidewalk would be added in the future so <br />they have opted to locate the segment during the build. <br />Com <br />missioner Stoner asked what the current public lake access is for Lake Owasso. Staff responded <br />that there is access via Central Park North via Heinel Drive as well as the County entrances. <br />Commissioner Baggenstoss asked if the dock area will be a private park for the homeowners. The <br />Developer confirmed andresponded that it is a pad with a picnic table. The developer addedthat the <br />majority of the area seen on the map by the dock is for storm water management and the remaining <br />area is for trees that they are trying to save. <br />Commissioner Stoner remarked that the Developer is adding the bituminous trail and working to <br />save trees which are both above what is required. He noted that the only land that may be beneficial <br />would be an option for lake access. However, as there is one via Central Park North, Commissioner <br />Stoner stated he would opt for cash in lieu of land. <br />Commissioner Lenhart motioned to recommend the acceptance of cash ($21,250) to the City <br />Council to satisfy the Park Dedication for Victoria St. N. and Orchard Ln./Co. Rd. C2. Seconded <br />by Commissioner Arneson. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Arneson, Baggenstoss, Brown, Dahlstrom, Hoag, Lenhart, O’Brien and Stoner. <br />Nays: None. <br />Abstain: Heikkila. <br />5)POCAHONTAS PARK NAME CONVERSATION <br />Chair Hoag relayed to the group that he feels it may be time to move to the next step of “what and <br />how” to change the name of the park. <br />Commissioner Arneson posed the question of if the name should be changed to honor the Indigenous <br />People as others appear to move to more generic names for product and places. <br />Commissioner Baggenstoss stated that this is an opportunity to change the narrative for a forgotten <br />voice. He continued that this is an opportunity for the Commission to be allies by utilizing the <br />guidance that is laid out in the Narrative Framework document that was provided by staff and that he <br />does not think the Commission should adopt a generic name. <br />3 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.