CC_Minutes_1953_1215 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

VILLAGE COUNCIL OF ROSEVILLE Regular Meeting Tuesday, December 15, 1953, at 2:00 P.M. L~l22 The Village Council met on the above date with the following members present: Connor, Willmus, Carlson, Membrez and Hammersten, Milner Carley, Village Engineer, was also present. Willmus moved, Connor seconded, that the minutes of the last regular meeting be accepted as they appeared in the copies given to the members of the Council. Roll call Ayes....,(4) Nayes-(O). Membrez being tardy did not vote. Clerk read the petition to rezone the O'Gara property (County Rd. Band Snelling Ave.). He also read the Zoning Board report which recommended that the petition be granted as the adjacent property is already zoned business and no objections to the rezoning were raised by the adjoining property owners. O'Gara Property Rezoning Mr. Brennan appeared representing Mr. otGara requesting the rezoning of the property. No one appeared against the rezoning. Ordinance #17~ be adoDted and 1 > Hammersten moved, Carlson seconded, that/theEast on~half (E2) of the Southeast oneMfourth (sEt) of the Southeast one-fourth (5EÌ) of the Southeast one-fourth (SEt) of Section 9, Township 29, Range 23, be rezoned from a Residential to a Business District. Roll Call Ayesø(5) Nayes-( 0). Clerk read the petition to rezone 180'x220' of Paper Calmenson property from Farm Residence to Industrial District. Clerk also read Zoning Board report stating no action by the Zoning Board is required.. Paper Calmenson Property Rezoning Claude Allen appeared for Paper Calmenson stating that the lSO'x220' piece of their property which they request to be rezoned to Industrial is now enclosed by a high fence and is rented by the Connelly Cartage Company. Ed Balzart, 1970 Walnut St. appeared against the petition. He stated the building is now on Farm Residence property. He stated that at the time Paper Calmenson built their plant that they had agreed to keeping 500 ft. of their property as a buffer to the industrial area. It is not the building that is objectionable but the trucks and the actions thereof, etc. Their actions are sporadic until midnight. Mr. Allen claimed only about once a week would there be repair work or trucks loading there. It is not a public nuisance as it does not interfer with any heavy traffic. Membrez said the Council realized that the building was erected through an error without a building permit. He asked if it actually is a nuisance as it is. Does it depreciate your property? Does it creRte a lot of noise? Would it be fair to leave it as is instead of asking to take the building away? Carlson said it was not the intention of the Council to let it slip by.