CCP 03212022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment B E XTRACT OF THE F EBRUARY 2,2022, R EGULAR M EETING OF THE R OSEVILLE P LANNING C OMMISSION 1 a. Consideration of a Request by Launch Properties for Preliminary Approval of a Major Plat th 2 to Subdivide 8.01 Acres to be Known as Twin Lakes 4 Addition Into Five Commercial Lots 3 for Future Developments (PF21-020) 4 Chair Kimble opened the public hearing for PF21-020 at approximately 6:40 p.m. and reported on 5 the purpose and process of a public hearing. 6 City Planner Paschke summarized the request as detailed inthe staff report dated February 2, 2022. 7 Member Schaffhausen asked when this plan was originally looked at was there a path going from 8 this location so people could walk easily to the park on the other side or to the restaurants and retail 9 area just beyond it. 10 Mr. Paschke did not believe the Planning Commission reviewed the minor plat but as a part of the 11 development project, City staff did look at and has been working with the applicant on pedestrian 12 access so there currently are sidewalks along County Road C as well as converting a ditch to be a 13 culvert with a trail across it that connects up to or by Oasis Park and will actually connect into 14 Oasis Park and then on either side of the road going into the residential development there are 15 currently sidewalks to get there. There might also be a pathway that goes from the existing trail 16 where the ditch system was over into the site as well. 17 Member McGehee asked if was possible to work with the developer so the path that is around the 18 darker red development, the senior development, that has trees along the back edge, there seems to 19 be a similar arrangement on the other side but she wondered if getting a path along that side 20 between the fifth lot and County Road C to make what seems to her a somewhat connection to the 21 retail area rather than going all the way down Hershel and making a big square. Then possibly 22 having the owners discussing coming across and catching the sidewalk that goes around the front 23 of the retail section. 24 Mr. Paschke believed staff could discuss this with the developer. He was not sure if that was a plat 25 item but staff could work with them on that. 26 Member Leutgeb asked if staff could talk about the irregular lot shapes that are proposed in this 27 plat, particularly lot 2 which is “L” shaped and narrow and she wondered what the future 28 development could become. 29 Mr. Paschke explained as it relates to lot design, commercial properties are not treated like 30 residential with perpendicular lines because their situations are much different. In this case, for the 31 most part there is shared parking throughout and shared access throughout. He showed a different 32 layout of the plans and explained the layout to the Commission. 33 Mr. Dan Regan, Roseville Investment Partners, addressed the Commission. 34 Member McGehee thanked Mr. Regan for his work on this and appreciated their efforts on getting 35 some good things for the community. 36 Public Comment 37 Ms. Kathy Peterson, 1751 Rose Place 38 Ms. Peterson explained she lives behind this project and wondered how traffic will be minimized 39 because traffic in the area already affects their neighborhood. She asked if there will be any plan 40 for increased police presence because she anticipated more accidents with the increased traffic.