2022_0222_PWETCPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BKV G R O U P These four options meet the programmatic requirements for each of the key city departments, albeit with varying degrees of flexibility. Options B and C in particular establish certain pnonties: protecting valuable visibility along Lexington for the high -traffic License Center and closing Woodhill for the sake of a larger maintenance area, priorities that have negative impacts to other parts of the project, such as a less useful maintenance facility and yard, and significant Impact to existing vehicle and pedestrian paths. FINAL RECOMMENDATION For the balance of efficiency, operations, phasing flexibility, and creation of outdoor public space, the final recommendation is that the City of Roseville utilize Options A.1 and A.2 for future planning. While these offer design alternatives, they are close enough in cost that continued consideration of these options during future planning and implementation will allow the City the flexibility to review priorities and values at the time, and to select an approach best aligned with those goals. Next Steps This document Is intended to guide phased implementation of near -term inferior renovations of City Hall to support planned operational changes, and longer -term planned investment in the License Center and consolidation of the Maintenance Facilities. Near -term: as the lease for offsite maintenance storage is at its limit, the city can utilize the phasing diagrams to locate storage facilities behind the License Center so no additional offsite facility is required. Also required within the next five years is investment in City Hall to accommodate the new Police Department staff, If Is recommended that the City review the recommendations, phasing, and projected cost estimates included in this report to establish a long-term investment strategy that addresses critical operational needs, strikes a balance between continued required capital improvement spending on aging facilities, and identifies target milestones for larger capital improvement. While a mull phase project enables completion of projects in smaller portions, this does extend the total life of project costs across a longer total duration, incurring increasing escalation costs, at approximately 4% per year, compounded, so it will be important for the city to understand and define their capacity. Option B License Center at Lexington Option C.2 Woodhill Removed ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY ABKV GROUP I OERTEL ARCHITECTS 14