My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022_0222_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2022
>
2022_0222_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2022 12:04:32 PM
Creation date
5/12/2022 11:57:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/22/2022
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MASTER PLANNING APPROACH <br />BKV <br />G R O U P <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Developing the campus master plan concepts was an iterative process of exploration, discussion, <br />and refinement. The master plan diagrams are developed using the long-term (15+ years) space <br />needs identified earlier in the study. The team reviewed options for how to re -purpose, expand, <br />and/or maintain the City's existing facilities in order to meet the City's future needs, as well as <br />challenging assumptions about what has to remain. Following review of initial planning options, the <br />City Council encouraged the team to be more bold in considering options that were not simply <br />solving problems within the existing civic campus, but were taking a bigger -picture view and <br />creating a vision for a vibrant, functional civic campus for decades to come. Removing some of <br />the self-imposed constraints the team was working within allowed for a holistic approach to rethink <br />the civic campus and how it could be a greater asset to the city- both staff and public. <br />One observation the team made was that the existing civic campus does not feel like o campus at <br />all, with the exception of a cluster of buildings centered around a parking lot. Every building faces <br />different directions, most often towards a parking lot and not a public outdoor space, and there is <br />no cohesive sense of identity in arriving at the civic campus. Improving the identity, connections, <br />and function of the civic campus became one of the goals of the team while planning for the <br />future space needs of the facilities located on the campus. <br />Existing Civic Campus Infrastructure Identified to Remain: <br />The following buildings and structures were identified to remain, either because they do not require <br />any changes as part of the forecasting of this project, or because there is inherent value In <br />retaining them in their existing locations. <br />• Fire Station #2 <br />• City Hall Building <br />• Communication Towers <br />• Skating Center and Oval <br />• Memorial Park <br />• Geothermal Well Field (North of Skating Center) <br />Phasing was considered throughout the planning process to maintain continuous operations for the <br />License Center and Maintenance Facility. Priority was also given to developing concepts that <br />addressed the need for additional on -site storage for the Maintenance Facility, to eliminate the <br />need for the currently leased off -site storage space. <br />MAINTENANCE FACILITY <br />A primary focus of the master planning exercise was developing a plan that provided efficient <br />operations for the Maintenance Facility. The four primary functions to this facility are vehicle <br />storage, vehicle maintenance, specialized workshops, and administrative/staff support areas. These <br />building blocks were oriented in a number of iterations to meet industry standards and best <br />practices for operational flow, maintaining safe vehicle access and circulation, while fitting within a <br />campus concept. This included exploring the reuse of existing facilities for various maintenance <br />functions and relocating some functions into proposed new structures that support more efficient <br />workflow. <br />19 I BKV GROUP I OERTEL ARCHITECTS ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.