My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 08082022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 08082022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 11:49:41 AM
Creation date
8/11/2022 11:49:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/8/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Attachment D <br />Developer Open House Summary for 2986/2994 Old Highway 8 April 28, 2022 <br />I held a zoom meeting open house on the proposed plat for the above-mentioned properties. I have <br />summarized below, pertinent comments directly relating to the project. <br />Paul Talarico: 2954 Old Highway 8. <br />Paul had questions regarding maintenance of the proposed private road. I advised him that an <br />association of some type would be created to maintain the road split amongst the new property owners. <br />He asked about removal/replacement of trees. I advised him about Roseville’s tree preservation plan. <br />His biggest concern was potential water impact on his property, as he has had issues standing water at <br />his property to the south. I advised him that Rice Creek Watershed district actually requires diminished <br />stormwater output (80%). He would prefer to keep the development single-family, not twin homes. <br />Al & Jane Bates: 2980 Old Highway 8. <br />Al & Jane like the “pastoral” setting of the properties and is against development of the rear portions of <br />the two properties. He felt development will destroy the ambiance of the neighborhood. He doesn’t like <br />the idea of potentially having five extra families on the site. He asked about selling some of the land to <br />the City for water control area. Jane felt that the tree preservation plan is “never enforced”. I advised <br />her to the contrary. <br />Brandon Kowal: 2960 Old Highway 8. <br />Brandon is concerned about water issues that he currently has in his own back yard. City solution is to <br />install sump pump into his own electrical system. He wonders if existing City infrastructure can handle <br />the stormwater from proposed plat. I advised him that I am in contact with Jesse Freihammer, Ryan <br />Johnson and the Rice Creek Watershed District regarding the engineering of the stormwater. <br />Kyle & Katie Dille: 2951 Troseth Road <br />Kyle advised others in the group that a developer’s job is to promote development. Concern had been <br />voiced as to what types of homes may be built on the land, not in favor of development. He mentioned <br />that his sump pump is “always running”. Lack of future plan for dwellings puts people on the defensive. <br />Judy Kolby: 3015 Troseth Road <br />Judy was hopeful of development of only one additional lot, facing Old Highway 8. She doesn’t like the <br />idea of houses behind houses and wonders about light pollution. She was hoping for less density, <br />especially in light of the Edison project to the north. She has concerns that Old Highway 8 cannot handle <br />more traffic. She also had question about the removal of trees and the preservation plan. She wondered <br />if the City would require lighting of the private road and if there would be a turn-around. I advised her <br />that City staff would drive those requirements. I advised her that for the development to be <br />economically feasible more than one lot would need to be created. <br />Laurie Starr & Roger Pastwa: 2999 Troseth Road <br />Laurie also indicated a preference for just one additional lot, facing Old Highway 8. I advised her that the <br />two combined parcels would not be wide enough to make three. I explained to her that Roseville has <br />changed zoning rules to allow for developments such as I have proposed. She had concerns about the <br />Page 30 of 35 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.