My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 08082022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 08082022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 11:49:41 AM
Creation date
8/11/2022 11:49:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/8/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Attachment D <br />native wildlife and that additional development may impact the throughway. She mentioned that her <br />husband has lived on the property for 68 years. She felt that even though this type of development may <br />be allowed, it shouldn’t be on this block with larger lots. She also asked about the stormwater <br />management plan, which I emailed to her subsequently. Her husband, Roger, emailed a letter to me that <br />was forwarded on to the City as well. It largely echoed same sentiment that this area of Roseville is one <br />of the last areas with very large lots and that he didn’t view new development as being beneficial. He <br />felt that development would destroy the character of an old established neighborhood, where everyone <br />is quite happy the way it is. He noted the area is the “last island” surrounded with rental <br />property/multiple housing galore. <br />Mike Cassel: 3002 Troseth Road <br />Mike mentioned that there is a drainage swale behind his house and neighbor’s. Big storms cause <br />ponding. Wanted to know if engineering would address, which I assured him it would. He indicated <br />development would disrupt the nature of the community and the character of the neighborhood. <br />Lindsay Cowles: 2996 Troseth Road <br />Lindsay said that the City should address existing drainage issues before considering plat request. She <br />felt that development will add to the problem. <br />Doug Burckhardt: 3003 Troseth Road <br />Doug mentioned water is an issue. He also is not in favor of development. I advised him that Rice Creek <br />Watershed will guide stormwater plan and will lessen existing runoff rates. Doug asked for advance copy <br />of proposed stormwater plan, which I furnished to him. <br />Roy Turenne: 2933 Troseth Road <br />Roy is concerned with the water, as he shares a backyard with Paul Talarico. He also asked if an <br />association was going to be formed for maintenance of the new dwellings and was hopeful that the <br />twinhomes would be “executive” style, rather than a cheaper split entry home. I advised him that I <br />would be seeking legal guidance on how to create an association for maintenance. He felt that lower <br />price twin homes would diminish property values in the neighborhood. <br />Jerry Bernhagen: 3006 Old Highway 8 <br />Jerry openly questioned who benefits from development of the properties. He felt that the Edison <br />project changed the area and that his main concern was property values. <br /> <br />This concludes the summary of the meeting. In order to accommodate all, the meeting was extended by <br />½ hour to a total 1-1/2 hours. I do have the zoom meeting recorded. <br /> <br />Very truly, Tom Brama <br />Page 31 of 35 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.