My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 05232022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 05232022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 11:55:39 AM
Creation date
8/11/2022 11:55:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
5/23/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Attachment D <br />41 Two representatives from the development company, Edison Land, LLC, were present at the <br />42 meeting to provide additional information on the development and answer and questions. They noted <br />43 that thereare many on-site recreationamenities provided for residents of the development, <br />44 including: fitness centers, community rooms, sport court, green space, swimming pool, sun deck, <br />45 walking trail with fitness equipment, rain garden, dog walk area and playground. The developers <br />46 worked with the city to connect pathways between the development and Sandcastle Park. The <br />47 developer discussed potentially purchasing a parcel next to the development as a potential land <br />48 dedication. <br />49 <br />50 Commissioner Matts-Benson asked what amenities are currently at Sandcastle Park. Staff noted that <br />51 there is a play structure, park building, ice rinks, tennis court, basketball court and a sandlot baseball <br />52 field. <br />53 <br />54 The developer defined where the pathways are located throughout the development. Commissioner <br />55 Arneson questioned if residents would feel comfortable going to acity park located within the <br />56 development. <br />57 <br />58 Staff noted that there could be potential opportunity to adjust the amenities at Sandcastle Park to <br />59 better fit with the needs of the neighborhood. <br />60 <br />61 Vice-Chair Hoag relayed that he believes Sandcastle Park, coupled with the amenities of the new <br />62 development, cover the needs of the residents in Constellation A. <br />63 <br />64 Commissioner Boulton made a motion to recommend cash in lieu of land,in the amount <br />65 of$1,015,750, to the City Council to satisfy Park Dedication at 3080-3110 Old Highway <br />66 8.Vice-Chair Hoag seconds. <br />67 <br />68 Commissioner Lenhart added that with the density of people in the new development it may be nice <br />69 to have green space available outside of Sandcastle Park. <br />70 <br />71 The Commission discussed the size of the land dedication opportunity and potential options for park <br />72 improvements at Sandcastle. <br />73 <br />74 Roll Call <br />75 Ayes: Arneson, Boulton, Brown, Dahlstrom, Hoag, Matts-Benson. <br />76 Nays: None. <br />77 Abstain:Lenhart. <br />78 <br />79 <br />80 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.