My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 07112022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 07112022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 12:12:38 PM
Creation date
8/11/2022 12:12:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
7/11/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: July 11, 2022 <br />Item No.: 7.e <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />Item Description:Consider a resolution condemning the use of discriminatory covenants, <br />discharging discriminatory covenants on city-owned property, and approving <br />participation in the Just Deeds Coalition <br />1 B ACKGROUND <br />2 On June 17, 2022Mapping Prejudice revealed the results of a multi-yearprocess of reviewing deeds <br />3 and mapping the location of discriminatory covenants (also referred to as racially restrictive <br />4 covenants) throughout Ramsey County. Using Mapping Prejudice’s data, Community Development <br />5 staff have mapped all Roseville properties encumbered with such covenants (see Attachment B). As <br />6 illustrated on the map, discriminatory covenants were used quite extensively throughout the City of <br />7 Roseville, with 289 properties identified as having such covenants. With the exception of some <br />8 parkland property, all covenants exist on land zoned Low Density Residential (LDR). In fact, 3.3% <br />9 of all LDR-zoned land is encumbered with a discriminatory covenant. The prevalence of these <br />10 covenants is a function of the government’s historical role wherebythe federal government required <br />11 them in order to secure FHA mortgage financing. In 1948, the US Supreme Court ruled that courts <br />12 were prohibited from enforcing discriminatory covenants, with the Minnesota legislature enacting <br />13 statutes in 1953 that prohibited new covenants, but existing covenants were still legal in Minnesota <br />14 until 1962. While unconstitutional, and no longer enforceable, their continued existence creates harm <br />15 and pain for Black, Indigenous and People of Color. Further, the use of discriminatory covenants has <br />16 created long-lasting inequities between White persons and Black, Indigenous and People of Color. An <br />17 example of a discriminatory covenant is as follows: <br />18 <br />19“The said premises shall not be sold, mortgaged, leased or occupied by any personor persons <br />20 who are not members of the Caucasian race, but this shall not prevent the keeping of domestic <br />21 servants who are not members of the Caucasian race.” <br />22 <br />23 Just Deeds is a project launched by the Golden Valley Human Rights Commission to provide free <br />24 legal assistance to homeowners who want to research and discharge discriminatory covenants from <br />25 their property titles. The City of Golden Valley has partnered with locallaw firms and title companies <br />26 to accomplish this work. Ramsey County has also committed to waiving recording fees for efforts <br />27 undertaken to discharge discriminatory covenants. <br />28 <br />29 Just Deeds published a toolkit for City staff to use to take the steps needed to join the Just Deeds <br />30 coalition. Cities wishing to participate in Just Deeds must: <br />31 Commit to the Just Deeds mission statement in word and in action (see Attachment C) <br />32 Dedicate resources to support the Just Deeds mission, which could include: <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.