CCP 10242022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

29 The Planning Division emphasizes the requested conditional use (CU) relates to the proposed 30 drive-through and it does not apply to any other aspects of the proposed development project, 31 which are governed by other sections of the Zoning Code. At the time of building permit 32 submittal, Planning Division staff reviews more detailed plans to determine full compliance with 33 all applicable zoning standards. 34 The Zoning Code §1009.02.Cand §1009.02.D.12 set the criteria for reviewing general and 35 specific conditional use requests. The Planning Division’s review of these criteria can be found 36 in the below Conditional Use Analysis section. 37 C ONDITIONAL U SE A NALYSIS 38 R EVIEW OF G ENERAL C ONDITIONAL U SE C RITERIA: §1009.02.C of the Zoning Code establishes 39 general standards and criteria for all conditional uses and the Planning Commission and City 40 Council must determine compliance with those stated findings. 41 The general code standards of §1009.02.C are as follows: 42 a. The proposed use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. While a drive-through 43 facility doesn’t appreciably advance the goals of the Comprehensive Plan aside from 44 facilitating continued investment in a property, Planning Division staff believes it does not 45 conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.More specifically, the General and Commercial Area 46 Goals and Policies sections of the Comprehensive Plan include a number of policies related 47 to reinvestment, redevelopment, quality development, and scale. The proposed drive-through 48 is one component of a larger investment, which would align with the related goals and 49 polices of the Comprehensive Plan. 50 b. The proposed use is not in conflict with a Regulating Map or other adopted plan. The subject 51 property is located within the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area, an area which obtains most 52 of its required development standards from a regulating plan, and specifically those 53 applicable standards in §1005.05. In the case of the subject property it is required to comply 54 with specific building placement and site design standards under the Urban Frontage 55 (1005.05.E.2) and/or the Design Standards listed in §1005.02.A. Planning Division staff has 56 determined the proposed site design (including the drive-through lane) and building 57 placement generally complies with the Urban Frontage and other applicable Regulating Plan 58 standards and is not in conflict with said regulating plan. 59 c. The proposed use is not in conflict with any City Code requirements. Planning Division staff 60 has determined the remainder of the project addresses all applicable requirements of the City 61 Codeas they pertain to the proposeddrive-through CU.Moreover, a CUapproval can be 62 rescinded if the approved use fails to comply with all applicable Code requirements or any 63 conditions of the approval. As part of the building permit review process, Planning Division 64 staff will conduct a complete Code compliance analysis, including zoning standards such as 65 landscaping, trash/recycling enclosures, vehicle parking, materials, etc. 66 d. The proposed use will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, and other public 67 facilities. Staff does not anticipate the proposal to intensify any practical impacts on parks, 68 streets, or public infrastructure. A traffic study (Attachment D) completed for the subject 69 development of a 2,230 sq. ft. drive-through restaurant. To account for traffic impacts 70 associated with the proposed development, trip generation estimates were developed for the 71 weekday a.m. and midday peak hours, as well as on a daily basis. These estimates were 72 developed using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. Results of this trip 73 generation indicate an expected generation of 193 weekday p.m. peak hour, 98 weekday PF22-009_RPCA_Starbucks_CU_100522 Page 2 of 5