CCP 11072022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 24, 2022 Page 10 403 benefit. With CBD, the Federal limit is .3 percent or less so it is highly suggested 404 to not restrict that so health professionals can use CBD. 405 406 Ms. Carol Moss, Attorney at Hellmuth and Johnson, Edina 407 Ms. Moss indicated she represents numerous retailers with businesses in the Can- 408 nabis industry. She noted she was at the City Council meeting in August and also 409 submitted some correspondence with some concerns she has. She will not go 410 through those concerns so much as try to answer the Council’s questions and con- 411 cerns already brought up. Regarding the sampling issues, the sampling and coupons 412 sometimes seen together in ordinances.The ban against sampling and coupons for 413 tobacco was based on a lot of data and studies that showed companies would use 414 samples and coupons to specifically target and hook a lower income communities. 415 That is where that ban comes from. How it relates to cannabis is a little bit different. 416 She strongly encourages not to have a prohibition on coupons because as Carpe 417 Diem could easily tell you, people reactdifferently to different types of canna- 418 binoids, different methods of consuming cannabinoids, and a lot of times people 419 will try a couple of different methods to figure out what works for them. Some 420 stores use coupons in order to allow people to try different things to figure out what 421 works for them. Also, a lot of these products can go bad and are perishable so cou- 422 pons can come in at that point. Regarding the fee, she has experience in dealing 423 with Woodbury’s very high fee and it has to corelate with their on-site consumption 424 liquor license. Since Woodbury passed their licensing ordinance, only two busi- 425 nesses have come forward to get the license and many times that high fee is cited 426 as a problem for smaller retail shops. This is limiting the THC licenses tothe larger 427 retail stores. Also, fees are not to be seen as income to a city but rather to cover 428 costs. She thought if that amount is outlandishly high there is some concern that it 429 is challengeablebecause that could preclude people from getting it and be used as 430 a defacto ban. She also asked that the City do not reduce the number of licenses. 431 432 Mr. Elijah Robuck, 1293 DraperAvenue W 433 Mr. Robuck explained regarding licensing fees, he did not know if the City could 434 make a special tax for it rather than a high licensing fee. 435 436 Mayor Roe closed public comment and thanked everyone for their comments and 437 emails. He indicated State Law does not give cities, generally, permission to tax 438 items anyway and specifically, the State Law related to these items provide for cit- 439 ies to do taxes. 440 441 City Attorney Gaughanindicated that was correct. 442 443 Mayor Roe thought it would be interesting to look at Woodbury’s ordinance and 444 see if they have separate tiers for on-site consumption versus simply a sale transac- 445 tion like an off-sale liquor or tobacco sale. He thought it would be interesting to 446 understand that better. 447