CC_Minutes_2022_1128 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,November 28, 2022 Page 14 Councilmember Willmus asked if those specific conditions have been spelled out in the Conditional Use respective to height, etc.,noting he missed that if they have. Mayor Roe thought it has to meet the City Zoning requirements. Councilmember Willmus noted Councilmember Etten gave some specific stand- ards that are less than Code and wondered if those are spelled out somewhere. Councilmember Etten indicated they are in this, but it is not a document that they must set by,but City Code is fifty-five feet, and the current proposal is 45.6 feet. Mayor Roe explained that he thought Councilmember Willmus was asking if with a condition of approving a Conditional Use, could the Council consider adding a condition that decreases the height limitation from Code requirement based on the proposal? He would look to the City Attorney, who nodded in the affirmative so the Council might have that ability. If the Council wished to do that as an amend- ment to the motion, it could be done. Councilmember Willmus moved, Etten seconded, an amendment to spell and cod- ify some of those standards the Council has been discussing as conditions to the Conditional Use. Mayor Roe asked City Attorney Gaughan if a way to address this is to say the con- dition is that the project must conform to the information provided by the proposer this evening as laid out on the plans. City Attorney Gaughan explained the Council could certainly condition approval upon the representations made by the applicant regarding the project. Councilmember Etten asked if the amendment made is so restrictive now that any building project gets going there may prevent the project from moving forward. Councilmember Willmus indicated if there would be a change to the Conditional Use it would have to come back to the City Council for approval; that is what a Conditional Use is for. Mayor Roe explained conceivably the Council could set something higher if the Council wanted to. Councilmember Willmus explained the Council is going through, looking at this, and making some justifications for the Conditional Use, which the Council is not obligated to provide, and there have certainly been some comments made with re- spect to design elements, etc. What he is saying is that the Council is inclined to approve this Conditional Use and the Council should go ahead and codify those in