My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0130
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2023 2:45:20 PM
Creation date
2/28/2023 2:45:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/30/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 30,2023 <br /> Page 13 <br /> converted. She stated these used to be City designated and since the time this was <br /> originally done, the bodies of water have become DNR named but no City ones <br /> were added that she was aware of. <br /> Mr. Freihammer explained all the other bodies of water mentioned fall under the <br /> wetland part of the ordinance. <br /> Ms. Gundlach indicated regarding the impervious surface under the stormwater <br /> changes being moved to Title 8, she pulled up the document prepared a while ago <br /> in connection with engineering about what is being moved out into Title 8. She <br /> believed that the impervious surface limitations are included in those regulations as <br /> well at twenty-five percent and are consistent. The difference is the things being <br /> moved to Title 8, someone would have the ability to go up to thirty percent if the <br /> additional hard surface is directed to an onsite or regional storm water ponding <br /> retention facility designed to accommodate the increased runoff prior to discharge <br /> from the site. <br /> Ms. Gundlach thought part of the problem now with it being in the Shoreland Over- <br /> lay District is the DNR is not ok with going up to the thirty percent so by moving <br /> it out into Title 8 that option still exists for the situations where it is the wetland <br /> situation but not the shoreland situation. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder asked if the natural cover of the shoreline will remain <br /> or will there be an upgraded natural plant because the natural cover on some of the <br /> shoreline is not really nice cover. <br /> Ms. Trapp explained the intention is looking for plants and vegetation that is not <br /> manicured lawn all the way up to the shore and not beach as well. It would be some <br /> type of plant material that will be protective of the shoreline and not be erodible. <br /> She indicated this can be reviewed again for wording and suggestions. <br /> Councilmember Strahan asked if Ms. Trapp knew how many people the changes in <br /> the Shoreland Overlay District would impact and be out of compliance if a new <br /> code is put in place. <br /> Ms. Gundlach explained there are many different factors that staff could look at to <br /> determine who would be out of compliance. She indicated the City does not have <br /> a lot of ADU's (Accessory Dwelling Units) so she is not really concerned about <br /> that. The City does not have a ton of situations where people exceed hard surface <br /> requirements and those would be grandfathered in once the City goes to the new <br /> model ordinance. She did not know if there were others. <br /> Ms. Trapp noted lot sizes were indicated while looking at the analysis but those are <br /> existing conditions as well. One advantage they were able to do that was not called <br /> out but is good to know,is that this code establishes that all of the underlying zoning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.