My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0130
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2023 2:45:20 PM
Creation date
2/28/2023 2:45:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/30/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 30,2023 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Community Development Director Janice Gundlach briefly highlighted this item <br /> as detailed in the Request for Council Action and related attachments dated January <br /> 30, 2023. <br /> Ms. Rita Trapp, HKGi, made a presentation on Roseville's Shoreland Ordinance. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated on the stormwater management overlay, he won- <br /> dered if the rules for those properties, one hundred feet from the stormwater ponds <br /> be essentially the same as what is being seen in the overlay district. <br /> Ms. Trapp explained those are rules regarding buffers of wetlands and what can be <br /> done within those areas. She indicated impervious surface is managed through the <br /> shoreland as well as through the stormwater but she noted she would have to check <br /> on that. <br /> Councilmember Etten explained if someone is seeking a variance to a shoreland <br /> setback then the person would need to do the twenty percent but he wondered if <br /> that would depend on the size of the variance because a different variance might <br /> have a larger impact. He asked if a minimum standard is going to be set or would <br /> the only standard shift. <br /> Ms. Trapp explained she would interpret this as the minimum standard that is the <br /> threshold that needs to be applied if someone is going to ask for a setback or im- <br /> pervious surface. There is always an opportunity with conditions for variances to <br /> adjust those conditions based on the magnitude. This is not setting a threshold from <br /> her perspective. It would be something the Planning Commission would look at <br /> and the Planning Commission and the City Council would be able to add additional <br /> conditions if needed. These are the ones to start with. <br /> Ms.Gundlach noted the DNR would be a review party associated with that variance <br /> application.Depending on what is negotiated between the property owner,the Plan- <br /> ning Commission,the Variance Board and the City Council,the DNR gets to weigh <br /> in on that as well. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated on the map of water bodies, there are some water <br /> bodies that are clearly not lakes and are more in the ditch category. But there are <br /> few that are not buffered on the map so he wondered if there was a reason, a certain <br /> acreage or size of water body before it counts for this regulation. <br /> Mayor Roe thought the simple answer to this was that the main bodies of water are <br /> designated by the DNR and the other ones are designated by the City. He imagined <br /> the only ones shown are those that are actually designated by the City. <br /> Ms. Trapp explained these are historically designated and a change was not made <br /> and no new bodies of water were added but there were bodies of water that were <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.