My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0130
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2023 2:45:20 PM
Creation date
2/28/2023 2:45:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/30/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 30,2023 <br /> Page 7 <br /> without a license. He also wondered if the owners have to provide records to the <br /> City regarding the minimum stay requirements and if the records are accurate and <br /> valid. <br /> Councilmember Groff thought the compliance part of this was tricky because the <br /> City is relying on neighbors to let the City know if there are issues. Otherwise, the <br /> City cannot follow-up with these easily. He explained if there are two complaints <br /> then the home can be referred back to the City to pull the license or at least talk <br /> about it. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated he would not disagree with any of the thoughts <br /> about limiting the total capacity of short-term rentals whether that is space between <br /> them or a density issue. He would be in favor of that as well as how the City can <br /> do a better job with giving the right tools and information to staff to enforce that. <br /> He thought in this process the City has learned about one home on Ryan Avenue as <br /> well as some other homes in the neighborhood that may also be operating as non- <br /> owner occupied. He would be in favor of an interim ordinance that would pause <br /> any future licenses to see if the City can put a better system in place. <br /> Councilmember Strahan remembered at the initial discussion that someone had <br /> mentioned having a log that the renter would have to sign,which was turned down, <br /> but she thought if the Council was wondering how compliant people are, a log of <br /> people may help as proof of stay. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder asked if the Council can postpone the decision on these <br /> for a short period of time. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated the Council could table action tonight but, given the advice <br /> of the attorney it probably could not be tabled for six months to look at the Ordi- <br /> nance. <br /> City Attorney Tierney explained the question is if the Council were to table to in- <br /> vestigate something about a specific license. That investigation was taking a spe- <br /> cific amount of time and would be one way to talk about what reasonableness would <br /> look like. It depends on the situation. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if the City could investigate something about an application that <br /> is not currently a licensing requirement, as far as information provided by the ap- <br /> plicant. <br /> City Attorney Tierney thought inherent in the Council's authority to grant the li- <br /> censes is the ability to investigate grounds that would be denial. Certainly if there <br /> was a license applicant who appeared to be simply unqualified to run that kind of <br /> business, investigating that applicant would be a legitimate use of staff time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.