CCP 02272023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment A E XCERPT OF THE J ANUARY 4, 2023 R EGULARLY M EETING OF THE R OSEVILLE P LANNING C OMMISSION 1 1. Public Hearing 2 3 a. Consider a Request by AUNI Holdings in Coordination with FedEx for a 4 Conditional Use to Allow a Parking Lot as a Principal Use at 2373 and 2395 County 5 Road C2 (PF22-015) 6 Vice Chair Pribyl opened the public hearing for PF22-015 at approximately 6:33p.m. 7 and reported on the purpose and process of a public hearing. She advised this item will be 8 before the City Council on January 30, 2023. 9 City Planner Paschke summarized the request as detailed in the staff report dated January 10 4, 2023. 11 Member McGehee asked for additional information on some of the parking lot things that 12 would be required. 13 Mr. Paschke indicated all of the current park lot requirements would be enforced for this 14 parking lot. He believed the difference is in the way the parking lot is designed for 15 parking vehicles. He indicated he has not had any discussion with the applicant regarding 16 parking of vans and the potential requirement of islands. Islands are required every 17 fifteen stalls and, in some cases, separate on the end of drive aisles in some cases but in 18 most cases. That discussion has not occurred as it relates to this parking lot. He indicated 19 the coverage is going to be eighty-five percent hard cover, fifteen percent green space. 20 Member McGehee asked if there was anything for EV charging. 21 Mr. Paschke indicated there was not anything like that and is not currently in the Zoning 22 Code. 23 Member McGehee thought this could be a condition placed on the approval of this 24 project. 25 Mr. Paschke was not sure it could be a condition. 26 Member Schaffhausen explained she went through staff recommendations and they kind 27 of matched many of the requests from people that live around this as far as some of their 28 concerns. She asked Mr. Paschke to provide a one-to-one match regarding the provisions 29 recommended that was provided in the bench hand out provided to the Commission. 30 Mr. Paschke explained that based on this proposal, the parking lot is set back currently 31 from that north property line and twenty-eight feet from the west property line. He 32 reviewed with the Commission the provisions in the bench hand out. He noted the goal is 33 to be to have a greater setback on the two property lines and also the attempt to try to 34 save some trees along the property lines, if possible. That is all going to depend on how 35 the site is engineered and how much earth that needs to be moved and those types of 36 things. 37 Member Schaffhausen thought it looked like staff was recommendingboth fence and 38 some semblance of landscaping as well. 39