Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT A <br />45 WHEREAS, there is currently a bill proposal before the Minnesota state legislature titled “Sacred <br />46 Communities and Micro-Unit Dwellings,” section 57, Senate File 1384 of the State Government <br />47 Omnibus Bill, which would require cities to allow similar Units under certain conditions; and <br />48 <br />49 WHEREAS, such legislation would take effect on January 1, 2024; and <br />50 <br />51 WHEREAS, Prince of Peace has stated they are willing to comply with the terms of such <br />52 legislation; and <br />53 <br />54 WHEREAS, in order to address the fact that the zoning code does not allow for such Units, City <br />55 Staff has recommended that Prince of Peace submit an application for an Interim Use Permit; and <br />56 <br />57 WHEREAS, Prince of Peace has taken the first step to obtain such a permit, that being an <br />58 application for an Open House on May 21, 2023; and <br />59 <br />60 WHEREAS, Staff has recommended that the imposition of the Board’s order to remove the Units <br />61 continue to be stayed while the legislation is being considered and Interim Use Permit application <br />62 is being processed; <br />63 <br />64 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; that the imposition of the Board’s order to remove the <br />65 Units is stayed until July 30, 2023 on the following conditions: <br />66 <br />67 1. Prince of Peace hosts an Open House related to the Interim Use Application on May 21, <br />68 2023. <br />69 2. The “Sacred Communities and Micro-Unit Dwellings” bill currently before the Minnesota <br />70 Legislature is adopted during the current legislative sessions held in 2023 in its current <br />71 form or in a similar form that requires cities to allow Micro-Unit Dwellings. <br />72 3. Prince of Peace files an application for an Interim Use Permit no later than June 2, 2023. <br />73 <br />74 AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the stay of imposition of the Board’s order will be <br />75 terminated if any of the above-stated conditions is not met. <br />76 <br />77 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , <br />78 and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: , , , <br />79 , and Mayor . <br />80 and the following voted against the same: . <br />81 <br />82 WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />83 <br />RS160\\5\\870388.v1 <br /> <br />