My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023_0425_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2023
>
2023_0425_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2023 9:04:51 AM
Creation date
4/27/2023 9:00:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/25/2023
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Addressing Citizen Concerns <br />Creating an open dialogue with citizens is an important step in understanding perceived and actual safety <br />issues of the public. The "Addressing Citizen Requests for Traffic Safety Concerns" Local Road Research Board <br />Report 2017RIC05 from 2017 identified steps for addressing citizen concerns for safety. <br />1. Problem Identification — Record their concern and ask questions regarding pertinent details to <br />best understand their issue. <br />2. Evaluation —Arrange for a site inspection and collect necessary data. Identify if there is an issue <br />and what steps can be made to mitigate. If there is no issue, communicate the appropriate <br />reasoning. <br />3. Response / Follow-up — If the evaluation takes more than a month, periodically update the citizen. <br />If the decision is to make a change, document this change and understand your agencies <br />processes. <br />This report also examines things to make the public aware of surrounding speed and safety. <br />• Speed complaints are often the residents "perceived" safety concern rather than an "actual" <br />safety concern. Collect data using a radar gun to determine if this is a perception or a reality. <br />• Speed humps/tables are larger issues involving more time and money to evaluate. They often do <br />not affect speed between humps. <br />• A change in speed is not likely to affect the safety concern. If speed is the key issue, install a <br />speed trailer to inform drivers of their speeds. <br />• Speed limits in neighborhoods are already likely at the state minimum based on law. <br />• Speed limit signs often advertise a given speed is acceptable even though it is desired that drivers <br />drive slower. <br />• Roadway narrowing to reduce speeds can be effective, but expensive. On -street parking can be a <br />lower -cost solution. <br />• Often the speed offenders are people that live in the neighborhood. Encourage citizens to talk to <br />their neighbors to have the discussion. <br />• Other measures to help reduce speed include posting yard signs or figures mentioning to slow <br />down, and also increasing compliance patrols with the police department. <br />m <br />Page 150 of 185 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.