My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 07102023
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
CCP 07102023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2023 4:17:04 PM
Creation date
7/14/2023 4:15:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
7/10/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Public Works, Environment <br /> and Transportation Commission <br />Excerpts from Meeting Minutes <br />Tuesday, September 27, 2022, at 6:30p.m. <br />City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br />5.City Roadway Speed Limits <br />Mr. Culver made a presentation on the City Roadway Speed Limits. <br />C <br />hair Ficek did not think a recommendation to the City Council would be made at <br />the meeting but he would like discussion tonight for staff to be able to gather <br />information and answer questions for the next meeting and figure out how much <br />public input would be needed. <br />Mr. Freihammer explained what was done in Falcon Heights was to model what <br />St. Paul did. Roseville is really trying to get to that point because it borders so <br />much of St. Paul. He also indicated a survey could be done as well. He thought <br />one of the big things would be to put some information in the newsletter for <br />residents to get information. <br />Mr. John Kysylyczyn, 3083 Victoria Street, indicated he has lived in Roseville for <br />thirty-five years. He reviewed some of the streets in the City where speed limits <br />are higher than in other areas and he noted those streets do not get a lot of traffic. <br />He reviewed his background and explained he was at the meeting because he is <br />generally opposed to the change in the speed limits because, from what he has seen, <br />this has been more about politics versus science. He provided background on the <br />2019 bill where this was passed in the Legislature. He explained this was more a <br />political process that brought this law forward, not one based upon science or sound <br />public policy. He reviewed history of some of the complaints over time with local <br />speeding. He stated the fact is that the crazies that are out there driving don’t look <br />at speed limit signs or stop signs or stop lights. There is no way to legislate for that <br />group of people because those people will not drive the speed limit no matter what <br />number is put on the sign. Another thing is if you talk to a Police Officer off the <br />record, the main reason why they are not going to be writing speeding tickets for <br />someone going 28 in a 25 is the cost of the speeding ticket. He explained the cost <br />is so high because the County gets a cut, the court system gets a cut, the law library <br />gets a cut and the State is still balancing a shortfall from the Pawlenty <br />Administration on the backs of traffic citation tickets. There is still a surcharge that <br />goes to the State. It is not teaching people a lesson, it is actually harming people, <br />it is penalizing people far more than educating them. One concern he does have is <br />Page 1 of 9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.