My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 07102023
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
CCP 07102023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2023 4:17:04 PM
Creation date
7/14/2023 4:15:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
7/10/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
when they create laws that you know a lot of people are going to break, what you <br />are doing is giving a license to all law enforcement entities to stop people. A person <br />needs probable cause to stop someone and question them. By passing laws making <br />most people law breakers, the officials are giving law enforcement a license to <br />really stop anyone they want to and that should be a serious concern that people <br />have. <br /> <br />Chair Ficek thanked Mr. Kysylyczyn for his input. <br /> <br />Mr. Culver explained that, as a representative of the City Engineers Association of <br />Minnesota, he actually testified against the 2019 bill that passed. The language that <br />finally ended up in Statute was actually a combination of a couple of bills that had <br />been introduced in the proper course of time through the process. There were <br />several hearings about it over the House and Senate committees. The feedback he <br />got when he was there from his own representative was that they were tired of <br />listening to engineers asking them to let the engineers study it again. His testimony <br />at the time was they should really give the engineers a chance to reconnect as a <br />group, as an industry and with the special interest groups to talk about what the <br />statutory stream of it should be, because the cities felt very strongly and counties <br />feel the same way about the fill that talks about the counties setting the speed limits <br />on their roads. This is not something that should be done piecemeal. This is not <br />something that one county or city should have a different set of speed limits than <br />the city or county next to them because it gets away from uniformity of the law <br />which then there really is confusion out there and people do not know what the <br />speed limit is if the person happens to not to see the sign, for whatever reason. That <br />was their major concern and he was told in very blunt words that the Legislature is <br />just tired of listening to the engineers and that the Legislatures were going to fix <br />the problem and this was their way of fixing the problem. He appreciated Mr. <br />Kysylyczyn coming done to discuss this. <br /> <br />Mr. Culver indicated that enforcement is going to be the biggest issue and how will <br />the City enforce this and when will it be enforced. How will the City get the police <br />officers to embrace some targeted enforcement in that and will clearly have to be a <br />part of the whole picture if the City is going to make the speed limit actually <br />effective. <br /> <br />Member Cicha thought it sounds like this is something the Commission should at <br />least hear from the Police Chief about because as he understood it, the Police <br />Department is against this and he would like to hear their reason why. He thought <br />hearing from the Police Chief would help in making a recommendation. <br /> <br />Chair Ficek wondered if this would be a good opportunity to collaborate with the <br />Police Department Commission on. He indicated he did not have any idea on what <br />that might look like though. <br /> <br />Page 2 of 9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.