My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_1023
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_1023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2023 10:18:27 AM
Creation date
11/28/2023 10:18:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/23/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 23,2023 <br /> Page 4 <br /> access, and the staff report mentions there would be a permitting process for some <br /> limited access. He asked what the process might be. <br /> Mr. Johnson explained the access regarding the Tamarack portion, typically and <br /> historically,the City has had a few occasions with which the City has granted case- <br /> by-case access,usually as it relates to maintenance. The process is simply a request <br /> to him, the Parks and Recreation Director, and a permit will typically be granted <br /> with very narrow parameters such as must be done on such date,must be conducted <br /> at a speed of less than ten miles per hour, must access via an identified route to <br /> ensure the natural resources are not being endangered. There are two competing <br /> interests here in this specific instance where the City would absolutely need to <br /> regulate access because one of the concerns from the neighbors on the east side is <br /> people simply driving through the park and creating that pass through and so it <br /> could not be carte blanche. Additionally, any time there is public on a pathway, <br /> those people are inherently being invited in and run into the issue of the one driver <br /> that is driving through the alley looking through their phone or something like that <br /> while a kid is on their bike coming around the corner. Those are things that keep <br /> him up at night. He would say, again, on a case-by-case, if it is somebody who <br /> needs to pull in a boat once per fall and once per spring, if the resident can identify <br /> what the need, the access path and the day it is planned to be done, the Park and <br /> Recreation staff would certainly consider that. But,he thought it cannot go beyond <br /> that functionally without really deviating from what the City's approach to park <br /> pathways has been. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated he wanted to follow up on when staff allow people to use a <br /> pathway for such as putting a boat away or something like that, or maybe even if <br /> someone is putting a tree in are there any requirements about perhaps blocking off <br /> the pathway or signage to warn the public of that activity. <br /> Mr. Johnson explained historically it is a pass through and what the City has done <br /> is simply issue the resident a letter stating the exact time to go in and the exact time <br /> to leave. He noted he could think of one instance where there was someone who <br /> has actually had heavy equipment in there and that was exactly what the City <br /> signage was required to essentially identify that a hazard was coming ahead. <br /> Councilmember Etten asked if there were some ways the City can work to limit <br /> vehicle drive through. <br /> Mr. Freihammer explained there have been a few other pathways in the City that <br /> had the same issues, and some planter bollards and boulders were installed that can <br /> be moved if needed but to make it narrow so driving cannot be done on the pathway. <br /> Signage is also installed to make it clear that it is not a driving pathway. <br /> Public Comment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.