Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment 2 <br />79 Member McGehee indicated she understood that. <br />80 Member Schaffhausen explained for the City to get in the way of and try to impede State <br />81 Law and try and wrestle with it, what the City is saying is it respects and represent that the <br />82 State is coming in this direction and the City is going to meet it and make sure that these <br />83 kinds of structures the City will be ready for, and that the City is not slowing down the <br />84 process. She indicated, for her personally, she is not interested in standing in the way of <br />85 State Legislature and trying to over legislate in front of that to slow something down that is <br />86 already on the way. She indicated she did not want to recommend an additional condition <br />87 because of the State Legislature and the City is not in the position to go and legislate the <br />88 State. <br />89 Member Aspnes asked staff if she read correctly that the City cannot legally put requirements <br />90 that are more stringent than the State Statute. <br />91 Mr. Paschke indicated that is correct. He indicated the Planning Commission can <br />92 recommend to the Council, but the Council cannot adopt conditions that are more <br />93 enforceable than what the State Legislation currently lays out. <br />94 Ayes: 6 <br />95 Nays: 1 (McGehee) <br />96 Motion carried. <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Qbhf!213!pg!377 <br /> <br />