My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024_0123_PWETC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2024
>
2024_0123_PWETC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2024 10:40:01 AM
Creation date
1/25/2024 10:38:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/23/2024
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 25, 2023 <br />Page 6 <br />Councilmember Etten explained who gets to vote on this in the end because it <br />affects multiple addresses. <br />Mayor Roe thought the votes should go in line with who would be eligible to sign <br />the petition. <br />The Council concurred. <br />Mr. Trudgeon indicated there really is not a place for the residents to vote; the City <br />Council would be voting on the name for the street, and it is initiated by the petition. <br />Councilmember Strahan explained a couple things come to mind, the first being <br />that the particular part of County Road B may include a large apartment building <br />so she wondered who have the input, the owner of the building or the tenants. Also, <br />would there need to be fifty-one percent of the people that reside there and then <br />other locations could include businesses and those owners may or may not reside <br />within Roseville so she wondered about their access and interest. She thought there <br />were a lot of questions, and this could have problems unless there is more specific <br />information. <br />Mayor Roe explained the petition, right now, is set up for property owners, which <br />is pretty typical in a process in terms of who can suggest names and be involved in <br />the process. He thought staff had enough information to work out a process and <br />bring it back to the Council for consideration. <br />Business Items <br />a. Adopt a Preliminary 2024 Tax Levy and Budget <br />City Manager Patrick Trudgeon and Finance Director Michelle Pietrick briefly <br />highlighted this item as detailed in the Request for Council Action and related <br />attachments dated September 25, 2023. <br />Councilmember Etten noted that he had several questions and appreciated the <br />follow-through and information that was provided to him by staff, <br />Councilmember Schroeder thanked staff as well because she had quite a few <br />questions going back and forth and appreciated everyone getting back to her in a <br />timely manner. She indicated there is a lot of detail and knew there will be <br />additional questions still coming. <br />Public Comment <br />Mayor Roe offered an opportunity for public comment with no one coming <br />forward. <br />Page 22 of 82 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.