Laserfiche WebLink
79 Vice Chair Mueller indicated she was looking at the costs and units of the 2024 <br />80 RFP and she was trying to remember what the fees are for residents and how much <br />81 it increased as well as what is expected this next round potentially. She was trying <br />82 to anticipate how this rolls out to residents. <br />83 <br />84 Environmental Manager Johnson explained the rate right now is $14.05 a quarter <br />85 for the recycling fee on the utility bill. That fee has all of the curbside recycling in <br />86 it and obviously the parks is part of it, but it also includes cleanup day, shredding <br />87 day, and staff. It covers everything and obviously the big driver in this case is the <br />88 collection cost. Staff has already been talking about the next round and he did not <br />89 think there is a big increase. <br />90 <br />91 Vice Chair Mueller asked how a multi -unit fee schedule compares to a single- <br />92 family household. <br />93 <br />94 Environmental Manager Johnson explained every apartment in a multi -family unit <br />95 is $14.05. <br />96 <br />97 Public Works Director Freihammer noted the proposed 2024 cost iN$14.50 a unit <br />98 which is about a 3.2 percent increase. This is mainly increased costs due to the <br />99 contract and general overall staff costs. There are not any major overall changes. <br />100 <br />101 Chair Ficek thanked Environmental Manager Johnson for the presentation. He <br />102 thought there was a lot of good information in there and looked forward to more <br />103 information in the first quarter of 2024. <br />104 <br />105 6. City Campus Solar Update <br />106 Environmental Manager Ryan Johnson updated the Commission on the City <br />107 Campus Solar plan. <br />108 <br />109 Chair Ficek thought this plan was a success. <br />110 <br />111 Member Hodder asked when staff was doing the feasibility analysis for the solar <br />112 was the City seeing what the consultant showed for a savings. <br />113 <br />114 Environmental Manager Johnson explained the City is close. The City is producing <br />115 close to what the consultant said the City would produce but are a little bit under <br />116 versus what was shown. <br />117 <br />118 Member Fergus asked if Roseville's goal is to have one hundred percent energy <br />119 produced onsite. He indicated he was confused by the two graphs that are shown in <br />120 the packet. <br />121 <br />122 Environmental Manager Johnson explained the graph on the left is City operations <br />123 to be one percent renewable and the graph on the right is twenty-five percent of <br />124 City operations would be produced onsite. Twenty-five percent of all of the energy <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Page 5 of 82 <br />