Laserfiche WebLink
The Character of Residential Developanent <br />The lack of public polic�r on most aspects of inetropolitan development <br />appears to be a major deterrent to mor. e coherent metropolitan develop- <br />ment. Many private interests , as well as government agencies , would <br />welcome anc3 need such policies to guide them in their decisions. With- <br />out such policies, it is fruitless and unrealistic to seek support for ' <br />nebulous community goals like "a better environment". During thP Joint <br />Program, it is essential that these groups, Particularly the builders and <br />lenders , be deeply involved in thc goal, policy, and plan formulation � <br />phases. <br />A majar stumbling block to more coher�nt and integrated suburban <br />residential development is the lack of adequate development capital. <br />Because large investments are required at the initial stage of develop- <br />ment (if all the necessary and desired facilities are to be provided), the <br />community and the builder frequently provide only the minimum facili- <br />ties, By the time a community can afford to provide other facilities, <br />the costs of doing so may have become exhorbitant and any attempt to <br />physically integrate the facility into the community may pose difficult <br />problems. Some means must be found to raise the capital required to <br />finance the initial large-scale investments for all the necessary and <br />desired facilities of an urban area. MPC should take an active role in <br />attem�ting to find an effective, equitable solution. <br />The basic character of a new urbanizing area is �stablished during the <br />early stage of development; yet, typica].ly at this stage, the community <br />is ill prepared to control its destiny. Normally, it suffers from an in- <br />adequate farm of government and financial resources , and the absence <br />of a knowledgeable strong leadership element in the community. By the <br />time some of these deficiencies have been remedied, the community <br />usually has lost many opportunities in ordering its environment. <br />(Obviously a few communities have ma.naged. However, they are the <br />exceptions. ) Although efforts can and should be made to help local <br />governments in the early stage of urbanization, it may be more fruitful <br />for MPC to establish leadership through other channels. "Higher" <br />governmental units, the building industry, and the lending field appear <br />to be prime choices to help provide the necessary leadership. There <br />will probably alvcrays be a governmental organization lag. Thus, barring <br />major governmental structural changes in the area, the possibility of <br />adequately gearing up local governments to meet the challenges of <br />urbanization prior to development does not seem too promising. <br />Sufficient financial r.esources will most likely have to come from sources <br />outside the individual community. <br />The suburbs look like they do because builders and lenders think sub- <br />division design and housing types common since World War II are <br />satisfactory. Competition within the lending field discourages the inno- <br />vator and tends to suppoxt the prevailing principles, standards, and <br />practices in the evaluation process. This situation does have one advan- <br />tage, however; once a significant group of firms adopt a par�tiicular <br />0 <br />, <br />