Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />i p <br />CONCLUSIONS A�VD THEIR SIGNIFICANCE TO COMMUNITY <br />DEVELOPMENT <br />Ke}r Groups in the Development Process <br />BUILDE2;; The builder is the primaxy initiator of the development pro- <br />" cess, but I�is d�'cisions are g reatly influenced by what he knows or <br />assumes to be acceptable to the lenders and con�umers, His business <br />, <br />is complicated, campetiiive, and unstable. The builder tends to be <br />cautious and conservative in his outlook and is disposed for the most <br />part to go on construc�ing familiar styles of houses in subdivisions with <br />the same la�youts that have proved saleable in the past. <br />LE�1DE1�: Many of the lending institutions have been closely involved <br />over the years in an effor� to pr.omote home ownership. The fed�ral <br />programs administered by FHA and VA have operated to make home <br />ownership increasingly possible. Together, lenders and government <br />have strongly encouraged new housing construction as against rehabili- <br />tation of the existing housing supply and have encouraged detached <br />single-family homes as against multi-family housing. <br />CONSUMER: This development has fitted the desires of the "typica�" <br />home buyer--the family with growing children. 7t has not well served <br />the other groups of c�nsumers--the people wh� have no childr�n, cannot <br />afford to bu}r, or prefer a multi-family dvvelling�-e�ren though these <br />groups Combined represent half the population. The buy�ing public chose <br />from what was available, and this choice in turn further reinforced t�e <br />belief that more single�family houses in the suburbs was "w�iat the <br />public wanted". <br />All three rou s need a reat deal rnore information to make sound <br />decisions. Gene.rally, there is a dearth o local informa�ion on such <br />things as land costs, site availability, and housing market opportunities. <br />This information is not gather�d on any systematic basis by the existing <br />associations serving the local industry, and only a few builders have the <br />staff to do this kind of research themselves. MPC and other planning <br />agencies could per�form a valuable service to these groups by providing <br />facts and interpretations on subjects of ix�terest and relevance to their <br />operations. Ove� the long run it could be expected that these groups <br />would make mQre et�lightened aecisions. <br />Builders and lenders have expressed a s�tron desire for stabilit and <br />order in the development process. The builders complain that sub- <br />divis�on regulations and zoning are not uniform in the same parts of the <br />Metropolitan Area and that individual municipalities have not enforced <br />these controls consistently among different builders. Bui�.ders contend <br />they would more readily accept the regulations and providE� the improve- <br />ments required if they were assured their development wo�ld not be <br />jeopardized by less regulated subdivisions. <br />3 <br />