Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />1�✓.iost builders in the business today have come up "through the ranks" <br />from being carpen�ers, electricians, or some other skilled employee in <br />the building business o Some have entexed from the real estate ranks or <br />other �elated businesses. Despite the significance of the builder's <br />product, for all practical purposes there is no formal training for this <br />business. There are only one or two universities that give a degree in <br />house building, and none that grant a degree covering all phases of com- <br />munity development. As could be expected, each builder has his own <br />strengths and weaknesses which show up in his operation. One builder <br />may be a particularly good salesman but not very knowledgeable in <br />design or the legal aspects of his oper.ation. Another builder might be <br />sensitive to design but wealc in salesmenship or financial operations. <br />These characteristics of the builders and the buildin industr essen- <br />tia y pro uce a very cautious �.n conservative group. Many uil ers <br />walk a tightrope between rea�sonab�e pro��t and poss�ble bankruptcy. <br />The industry itself is precariously tied together by all types of financial <br />prograr�s. Capital .for all phases of building is very heavily dependent <br />upon credit. These situations, in conjunction with the other factors <br />mentioned, require the builder to make fairly quick decisions about <br />location of operation, housing type, etc. , and at the same time to pro- <br />ceed with caution so that he does not step off the deep end. This <br />siivation creates a psychology of producing what was previously success- <br />ful and being extremely wary of radical changes. <br />The Lende r and the Lending Field <br />The lender is in business to make a profit with a minimum of risk< <br />Fundam�ntally, he provides a service and the necessary financing for <br />the whole housing industry and the consuz�ner. The lending risk does not <br />usually depend upon the builder selling his house to the consumer but <br />upon the con�umer continuing to meet his obligations. In addition, the <br />lender is concerned that the property maintains its value over a long <br />peri�d of time in the event that foreclosure might becarne necessary. <br />This is somewhat the converse of the builder who generall;� is not <br />directly involved with the house after its sale. �Vhen the lender invests <br />. money in construction loans and land development loans, he is concerned <br />with the ability uf the builder to market the product. <br />� In contrast to the building industry, the lending field is very articulate <br />and hi lzl or anized with se ments of it extremel influential on national <br />housing policieso The lending ield can best be described as eing <br />composed of a nuinber oi homogeneou� groups, savings and loan associa- <br />tions, cominer�ial banks, and others vying for businesse Each of these <br />groups is tending to look, and operatE more like the others as time goe:s <br />on, although each ha,s varying requiremPnts and characteristics. The <br />savings and loa.n associations have had phenomenal growth since the <br />1930's. This growth has resulted from a number of factors, but pri-- <br />marily from legislation, programs, and encouragement of the federal <br />governinent. 5ince savings and loan associations a.re not only interested <br />in supporting ancl promoting residential construction but more specifically, <br />17 <br />