My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_00366
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF001 - PF999
>
300-399
>
pf_00366
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2024 2:28:09 PM
Creation date
2/8/2024 1:06:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
366
Planning Files - Type
Rezoning
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
627
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />� � . . . . . 1 ' t . ez;,: <br />;:i <br />. � . � � � J, � ', <br />ROBERT A. JONES , � � <br />CClNSUL7iNG' ENGlNiElt3' <br />CA CiRANt'aE, td.LilVQE$ <br />Page 6 <br />each block to d�tet�mine �he de �ree and '' <br />. � qu�ality of telev�.sion in <br />nearby areas. <br />I� was interesting to note how many homeowners p,va�ch i�ferior <br />TV. Thi� is usually due to one of two causes. Either it �is due tr� <br />t�e TV receiver needing a. serviceman, or to a pocr indo�r ant�nna. <br />In many cases w� observed owners using "rabbit-�ear" antennas; in a <br />few cases they used "rabbit-ears°�with calor se�s, This is not recon�m�-' <br />ended by TV s�rvicemen or dealers. � <br />We received several complaints that inte�ference was r�c�iv�d <br />only on rainy days or windy c�ays. Tuesday, October 15tho, was a <br />very rainy da�; out of 1� honas inspected that day we saw nra unusual <br />,� <br />interfer�nce attributai to rain. Likewise on October ].6th., when <br />it was very windy we �aw no inteference that could be caus�d by the <br />wind. It is my conclusion that nei.ther wind or rain caused any change <br />in the quality of TV receptiQn, We did notice an increase in ANf <br />noise on the rainy day. <br />. .� <br />In suanmary, it is my conclusion that N.S.P. should take corr�ct- <br />ive action on these homes listed xn Section4 of this regort and all <br />other claims within the 3Q0 feet si�rvey area should be rejected; and <br />that as soon as I have been notified by N,5,P. that such action has <br />k�een c�anp].eted, I will file the certification requir�d with the <br />Villag�, as per thP Viliage Resolutian. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.