Laserfiche WebLink
� .,' - �� � <br />July 2. 1975 <br />PLANNING REPORT <br />CASE NUMgER: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />PLANNING GONSIDERATIONS: <br />;: <br />' <br />,: <br />907 - 75 <br />Dayton Development Campany <br />Rosedale Shopping Cent�r Property <br />Approval of Preliminary Re-plat <br />1. The pr�perty in que�tion is the entire parcel occupied by the <br />Rosedale Shopping Cenier bounded by Highway 36, C�unty Road B-2, <br />Snelling Avenue, and Fa�irview Avenue. You will recali in about <br />1y10, that the Dayton - Hudson Company platted the land as "Rosedale <br />Center� First Addition" placing the parc�l into three ints. The <br />attached sketch shows this division with one iot occupied by the <br />Dayton Store and parking allocated to it, the second lot for the <br />"Tenant building" and its allocated parking, and Lot 3 for the <br />second departme�,t store. <br />��r��� � <br />2. Due to the impending addition of the Pennys Department Store, the <br />Dayton - Hudson people propose at this tim� to re-plat the lots <br />so as to provide a parcel for this building and its allocated <br />parking. <br />3. The curre�t proposal is to devise three lots which are shown on <br />the attached drawing as dotted lines. In addition there ar� f�ur <br />outl�ts l�beled A, B, C, and D. These relate to int�rnal adjustments <br />which will be explained by the Dayton - Hudson People at the hearing <br />as they rel�te to the existing and pr�psed development plan af <br />the center. <br />4. Outlot D was proposed as a potential building site at thE westerly <br />quadrant of the entrance at Caunty Road B-2 and Snelling Avenue. <br />We suggested to the applicant that a proposed building site at <br />this iocation would be of grave concern to the City. This is <br />based on the very negative reaction on the part of the �ity to <br />a similar proposal for a separate building site for a TBA at the <br />opposite corner to the southeast �rom Outlot D as proposed. The <br />Dayton - Hudson Compan,y have informed us that they wish Outlat D <br />�a be deleted f rom the plat currently in question. We suggest <br />this deletion in as much as the creation of a legally constituted <br />iot is a first significant step toward the establishment of a building <br />right at a particula� lacation on the property. <br />