My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2024_0122
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2024
>
CC_Minutes_2024_0122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2024 10:10:20 AM
Creation date
2/13/2024 10:10:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/22/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 22,2024 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Councilmember Schroeder indicated one thing she wanted to point out was the 10- <br /> year battery, which is something the City actually pays for. <br /> Fire Chief Brosnahan indicated that is correct, there is some cost associated with it <br /> and one thing to highlight is that it is not an option they offer to any other customer. <br /> It is something they have offered to the City as an opportunity. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder asked if there were any benefits of the diesel engine <br /> over the EV engine. <br /> Fire Chief Brosnahan explained there is consistency in the operations. <br /> Transitioning to the EV would require training for that type of equipment but <br /> outside of consistency, he could not think of any other benefit. <br /> Councilmember Strahan understood the time frame for getting the EV vehicle is <br /> shorter in order to lock in the pricing she wondered if they would be delivering a <br /> whole year sooner to the Fire Department. <br /> Fire Chief Brosnahan anticipated it to be five to seven months earlier. He indicated <br /> if the City went with diesel, he would anticipate Spring 2026 and if the City went <br /> with EV delivery might be late next summer. <br /> Assistant Fire Chief Sjostrom explained one of the things Rosenbauer is allowing <br /> the City to do is to make the purchase now. Rosenbauer will put the truck in its <br /> build queue, will build and deliver it, and allow the City to stave off the first <br /> payment until January 2026. This keeps the City in its replacement window and <br /> training cycle of getting a new vehicle in service while also giving them a little tail <br /> end of when the City has to actually make that payment.This helps with timing and <br /> the financing side of it. <br /> Councilmember Etten thanked the Chief and Assistant Chief for their extensive <br /> responses provided to his questions. He wondered why the EV vehicle is so much <br /> lower to the ground than the Diesel engine. <br /> Assistant Fire Chief Sjostrom reviewed the build of the EV vehicle. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated the City is looking at the potential of this being a <br /> ten year first out engine. He wondered how this could be calculated when it does <br /> not appear that the EV fire engines are that old. He asked what the longest <br /> timeframe is that a department has had this type of vehicle in its fleet. <br /> Assistant Fire Chief Sjostrom explained the EV has been in testing six to eight <br /> years. He reviewed the driveline studies with the Council. He noted the driveline is <br /> what makes the City's fleet unreliable in the fire service. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.