My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2024_0122
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2024
>
CC_Minutes_2024_0122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2024 10:10:20 AM
Creation date
2/13/2024 10:10:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/22/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 22,2024 <br /> Page 13 <br /> Councilmember Etten asked what happens to the Fire Department's second and <br /> third engines because if the EV is going out for ten years, which puts the second <br /> and third engines at fifteen and twenty years,this is different from the current cycle. <br /> He asked if the Fire Department needs three or are there concerns at twenty years <br /> that the third backup would not work. <br /> Chief Brosnahan thought it offered them some flexibility in looking at the <br /> timeframe right now there are three diesels that were bought in 2010, 2015 and <br /> 2020. He thought if they were to fast forward to 2035, looking at it,he thought the <br /> 2020 engine would still remain in service at a reserve capacity. A lot of it depends <br /> on wear and tear and how well it functions. He thought that as long as it is still <br /> functional and operational the Fire Department would still continue it in a reserve <br /> capacity. <br /> Councilmember Groff noted this was not the first time the Council has seen some <br /> of this material and he felt pretty comfortable with it. The financing has to be <br /> further researched, he likes the idea of something lasting longer, and from an <br /> environmental standpoint having a vehicle last an extra five years is a big deal. The <br /> costs are less per year for servicing the vehicle and he understood Councilmember <br /> Etten's concern regarding the length of the vehicle in service but listening to the <br /> department heads indicate they are comfortable with it,he accepts that analysis. He <br /> thought being able to lock it in now rather than wait for prices to go up is an <br /> important factor as well. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Mayor Roe offered an opportunity for public comment with no one coming <br /> forward. <br /> Strahan moved, Schroeder seconded, approving the transition to EV and enter into <br /> a contract with Rosenbauer to purchase an EV Fire Engine and approve the sale of <br /> existing reserve diesel engine. <br /> Council Discussion <br /> Councilmember Strahan appreciated Chief Brosnahan and Assistant Chief <br /> Sjostrom's innovative approach, especially the injuries. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder appreciated all of the research that was put into this, <br /> noting the real question was whether this the right time to do this. But looking at <br /> the data and the Finance Commission recommendation, it does seem to make sense <br /> at this point. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred with what Councilmember Schroeder stated and indicated he <br /> was supportive of this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.