My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2024_0122
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2024
>
CC_Minutes_2024_0122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2024 10:10:20 AM
Creation date
2/13/2024 10:10:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/22/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 22, 2024 <br /> Page 15 <br /> Assistant City Manager Rebecca Olson briefly highlighted this item as detailed in <br /> the Request For Council Action and related attachments dated January 22, 2024. <br /> Ms. Olson asked the Council regarding questions 26-30 if these should be replaced <br /> with information in the RFCA. <br /> Councilmember Etten thought some of the survey questions were duplicates of <br /> other questions in the survey and he wondered why these questions would be asked <br /> in different yet similar ways. He also wondered if this was part of the discussion <br /> with Morris Leatherman. <br /> Ms. Olson explained this was not. She asked if Councilmember Etten was <br /> referencing the suggested "How well are the facilities and services meeting your <br /> needs". She stated what staff could do, if those are the questions he would like to <br /> consider, the questions could be combined and just update some of the facilities <br /> and other suggestions into one question. <br /> Councilmember Etten explained starting at question 18, it is talking about <br /> recreation facilities, about how people would rate them, upkeep of park <br /> maintenance, and park programming. This is essentially hitting all of those so he <br /> would be reluctant to change the questions unless there is some real specific reason <br /> why these questions got to something much deeper. The goal is consistency as <br /> much as possible and he felt these questions are getting to almost the exact same <br /> thing without being redundant. <br /> Mayor Roe thought it looks like the question being suggested talks about how well <br /> these specific facilities meet the needs of the household and as he looks at the other <br /> questions starting with 18,they do not have a specific question about these specific <br /> facilities. Then, questions 26 through 30 are very specific to those buildings. He <br /> understands what this is getting at but is not necessarily these other questions. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted question 31 asks about recreation and sports facilities <br /> and what is missing. Maybe there is an addition for certain facilities that could be <br /> added or expand some of that but when talking about community versus <br /> neighborhood parks, as most people do not know the difference. Trails are <br /> mentioned multiple times in these questions and much of this is delineated, so if <br /> there is something specific they want to get that is fine, but he did not want to ask <br /> a question about six or seven different things that he thought were mostly <br /> addressed. He would actually get rid of some of these other ones beyond some of <br /> that. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated he could get behind that to not be redundant in that section <br /> but also making sure the City gets out the information that is trying to be achieved <br /> through this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.