My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2024_0122
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2024
>
CC_Minutes_2024_0122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2024 10:10:20 AM
Creation date
2/13/2024 10:10:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/22/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 22, 2024 <br /> Page 16 <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated for question 21, he would add a question about <br /> rating park and recreation events. He also wondered if question 24 was necessary <br /> when the City has a pathway masterplan. He agreed that question 26 is not <br /> necessary and maybe questions 27 and 28 are adapted to include more facilities, if <br /> that is desired. With questions 29 and 30, he was not sure what the City is getting <br /> from these questions. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated that was good feedback and concurred with Councilmember <br /> Etten. <br /> Councilmember Strahan thought question 10 was not a yes or no question and if <br /> the City really wanted an answer,it should be asked in a different way. She was not <br /> sure why some of these questions were asked. She felt question 66 had some <br /> similarity to question 12 and maybe these questions could be combined. She was <br /> concerned about question 68 because it said, "affordable housing rentals, many, <br /> few or too much", and asked what is the City going to do if the response is too <br /> much. She felt that was not something that can be changed and maybe sentiment <br /> could be measured in a different way. What she thought was really concerning the <br /> last time this was done, was that there were very few people of color, and the age <br /> was fairly skewed. She thought they needed to find a way to get the voices of more <br /> than one type of people. <br /> Ms. Olson explained how Morris Leatherman come up with the demographics of <br /> the City to get the respondents. Ms. Olson continued with question 84,it is actually <br /> the intro to question 84 that staff is recommending a change. She reviewed the <br /> suggested changes with the Council. <br /> Mayor Roe thought the changes were fine. <br /> Ms. Olson indicated on question 93, staff is suggesting the introduction be changed <br /> to 2019 and before question 98, the suggested edit is to add a longer intro and is <br /> more of an education piece and remove questions 98-99. <br /> Councilmember Etten suggested the beginning of question 100 be adjusted to <br /> include curbside collection program, noting it may be delayed by a couple of years <br /> but that is the goal. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested adding "when curbside collection program is available". <br /> Ms. Olson explained question 102 should probably remove "local newspaper" <br /> because the City no longer has one and add"City emails",and question 104 because <br /> there are a couple of different things considered Roseville City news,just to clarify <br /> that this is the printed City publication. <br /> Mayor Roe thought generally the changes were acceptable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.