Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />�� <br />pay lower rent, and this rent projection would have to be reflected in the quality of <br />the building to make the project economically feasible. <br />With regard to health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding area, <br />the benefits would be those connected with providing more open space because of the <br />lesser ground coverage of the taller building and the amenities provided by not <br />obstructing so much of their view as would be obstructed b� a low rambling building. <br />With reference to the permiited use variance, these additional auxiliary uses will <br />provide convenience for the clients of the tAnants of the building, thus attracting � <br />better tenants, indirectly benefiting the area as a whole. The spec+al use permit � <br />would have no negative effect on the area as a whole because they will not even be � <br />accessible other than from the interior of the building, The printing shop will probabl <br />Y ; <br />be located in the basement, and the prescription counter and barber shop off the central :, <br />hall near the elevators. , <br />13. What will be the effect on existing and anticipated traffic conditions, including <br />parking facilities, on adjacent streets ? <br />The same basic traffic pattern would be used whether a six-st�ry buildinq or a shartec <br />building were approved, although the taller building would provide greater parking area <br />and less congestion. <br />14. What will be the effect on property values in the surrounding are� ? <br />We believo that this buildinq will add esthetic value to the wnole neighborhood, and <br />in addition to the initial appearance, the economics are such that th� deterioration <br />that �s inevitable in any aea has a better chance of being deferred. <br />(Note) <br />Homes located to th� south of subject property are located a <br />south oi their north lot line. The total lot de th is a ppr�ximately ).17 feet <br />situation provides a p PAroxirnately 179 ��et:. This <br />pproximately an additional 50 fcet of bi�ffer for these homes <br />over and above that which would k�e provided tivere tha�e residsntial lots df normal <br />depth. <br />