Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />� <br />side. 'When and if additional land is acquired to the south of the present <br />property, it should be the prime objective to eliminate these asphalt �areas <br />on the west and north side and re-orient the ioading and receiving away <br />from the north side entrance. Mr. Fuith indicated that thi� too would be <br />the objective of the developer at any fufure stage of expansion. <br />c. Last year the V�Ilage approved fihe expansion of a park�ng facility on <br />the east side of the plan which is currently layed out to accommodate <br />40 cars. The dimensions are suca�, however, that 46 cars could be <br />accommodated on this lot if the parking were pfaced perpendicular <br />rather than on adiagonal,asis current(y the caseo Th�r� are an additional <br />4 parking spaces, parked parallel on the wesfi side of the buiidin�, Thus, <br />the present parking capacity is 44 spaces which could be esnlarged to a <br />total of 50 without additional consfructinn. The ordinanc� require�rnents <br />on parking would require 7 parking spaces for the office area at a rate <br />of 1 parking soace for ea��h 150 square feet c�f net affice area, and a <br />total of 43 parking spaces for the industrial cirea c�t a rate of 1 parkiny <br />space per 1,000 square feeto In the industrical district ] parking space <br />per 1,000 sauare feet or 2 park�ng spaces for every three empioye�s <br />(whichever is greater) is requiredo Accarding to Mre Fuith ther� wili <br />be 56 employees. Two-fihirds of 56 being approximately 38 wo�rld <br />produce a parking requ�rsment of 45 (38 plus 7) for the tota� structure. <br />On the basis of 1 parking space per 1,000 the total requirement,of <br />course,would be 50e <br />d. Thus, the prop�erty in question can a�commodate the required number of <br />park;ng spaces as specified by the zoning ordinance. The real question <br />is,of course, is there adequate parking according to the needs. Nir. <br />Fuith indicates that many of their employees walk io work having moved <br />to the area during the period since 1941 when the ini�`ial plan was <br />establ ished at this location o He indicates the present parking facil ifiies <br />are adequate for the current employee load o We would conclude that <br />there is adequate parking for the developme�t in question and that should <br />additional parkinc� be required, ther=e would be available space in the <br />grassed area to the south of the present structures� <br />e. We suggest that the real solution to the �roperty in question ultimately <br />is the acquisition of additional land. This would enable access tn the <br />parking to the east without utilizing the c'ircuitaus raute around the <br />building fio the north side, If this is done the area of land that is <br />somewhat sur'rounded by buildings south of the area marked "shop" <br />could be built-in fhus, allowing service to the vault storage and <br />casting room from ti�e easte This vvould then eliminate the drive around <br />the north and west sides resulting in g.reater effici�ency for the operation. <br />