Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />Case No. 523-69 (Continued) <br />suggests that this� is a problem with major proportians, <br />� <br />3. There is also the question of fihe priority of having interchanges every half <br />mi(e along Snelling Avenue. You are aware that the Metropolitan Cauncil <br />has taken a strong position recently afitempting to prevent fihe over-develop- <br />ment of in�erchr�ges on such a short modular. Except under conditions where <br />we are serving major commercial uses, as is the case on Highway 3b, we feel <br />that generally there is a good point in attempting to reduce the number of <br />interchanges an limited access highways. <br />4. Lr�rge scale drawings of the proposed pfan will be r�eviewed at the pubiic <br />hearing�at which time we can consider additionai detail questions with <br />respect to this proposal . It would be appropriate, in our opinion, to hold <br />meetings with the affected developers contiguous to Snelling Avenue before <br />taking ony final action on the plans in qvestion. <br />